Froch/Dirrell: Another look.

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Piffer, Jan 21, 2010.


  1. eiregobrach

    eiregobrach Member Full Member

    430
    0
    Dec 17, 2008

    Froch didn't look his normal self between rounds 1-9 as well. Difficult fight to score but i just didn't feel Froch landed enough or imposed himself enough.
     
  2. Bodysnatcher

    Bodysnatcher Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,302
    0
    Oct 27, 2007
  3. DeanoFlash

    DeanoFlash Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,021
    2
    Aug 3, 2009
    [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GUm8AHqiPKU[/ame]
     
  4. Piffer

    Piffer ****** KIT KAT Full Member

    1,603
    2
    Jul 19, 2004
    This content is protected
     
  5. pavlikfan

    pavlikfan Active Member Full Member

    715
    0
    Jun 28, 2007
    It comes down to this:

    People who value boxing, think Dirrell won.

    People who value "bravery" and "fighting like a champion", think Froch won.

    If the two fought today, it would be Dirrell 12-0 or KO inside 8.
     
  6. pavlikfan

    pavlikfan Active Member Full Member

    715
    0
    Jun 28, 2007
    I agree. It was far from a wretched fight. It was a very interesting clash of styles: crude toughness vs. pure, unrefined talent.
     
  7. 46and0

    46and0 It's irrefutable. Full Member

    7,011
    139
    Dec 6, 2008
    It was a disgraceful decision. Dirrell was clearly robbed. There has been a lot of revisionism by the UK boxing press and Froch fans with this fight.
     
  8. MrPR

    MrPR Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,197
    34
    Mar 23, 2009
    Actually Dirrell did in my opinion
     
  9. Seven Chance

    Seven Chance Augustus Style Journeyman Full Member

    1,626
    0
    Apr 1, 2008
    Who the hell would want to take another look at that crap fight. Dirrell showed he has no

    desire to prove he's a good boxer & Froch is just not that good.
     
  10. des3995

    des3995 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,903
    126
    Oct 23, 2009
    It's funny, but as time goes by, there's one thing I consistently notice about this fight. It seems those that have Froch winning the fight.... his fans, the judges, neutral parties ( I thought Dirrell did, but that's not my point)....those people don't really point out what Froch did to win the fight.... they point out what Dirrell did not to win the fight. It seems to me that they were more interested in punishing Dirrell for his spoiler tactics than rewarding Froch for anything he did.

    I also find it interesting that Dirrell's stock has remained steady, despite his performance that night, while The Cobra's has taken a hit, even though he won. Most seem to think that if they were to fight again, that Dirrell would win fairly handily.
     
  11. Talivar

    Talivar Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,022
    52
    Jan 22, 2008
    If they fought again Dirrel would be more confident and would stay and hit froch more, much more, then he would get KO simple as that. Dirrel survived the fight by fleeing for most of it. Interesting to see if he trys same vs AA and how people judge him after that.
     
  12. Farmboxer

    Farmboxer VIP Member Full Member

    86,106
    4,096
    Jul 19, 2004
    Dirrell ran, held, fell down on canvas and complained. How is that winning a fight?
     
  13. des3995

    des3995 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,903
    126
    Oct 23, 2009
    Case in point.
     
  14. M.I.G.

    M.I.G. and STILL... Full Member

    1,524
    0
    Apr 22, 2006
    Dirrell won the fight with his clean punching and then lost it with everything else. Fight's over. Froch won because it was in England. Dirrell's the better fighter and it will be shown by the end of the tournament.
     
  15. GladiatoR

    GladiatoR Guest

    Froch won because it was in England?

    In case any of your dumb ****ing Yanks don't realise, the ref nor the judges were British.

    So stop with the hometown decision bull****.