Oh dear.......

Please somebody tell me how you can be landing more punches all the way through a fight and a judge only gives you three rounds out of 12. This sort of decision seems to be getting more common on FNF and I'm really starting to wonder if there's no something sinister happening.

 

Parris is the oddest sounding Yorkshireman that i've ever heard. He may live up here but I think he was born in London

 

stop crying foul if you call this close fight a robbery . then you dont know boxing

and thats why the word disgracefull decision or robbery are far to common on these forums

because alot of you cant score for ****

by the way i think napa won the fight but it was lose very close

the only bad thing was dave parris card

 

Its nonsense.. can sommeone please explain the same thing to me.

The thing is that judge will be back judging next week but napa loses his title shot

 

its peaple like you that call a close fight that didnt go the way you thought it should . stop crying you think it was wrong way but it was close

 

No one is callinng it a robbery BUT the right person didn't get the decision at the end of the day.

 

The fact its a close fight doesn't mean that one biased card is cause for a "robbery".

(Sorry if this has been said before guys, but I'm skimming the thread and just in from pub)


;O)

 

:nut

like i said in your opinion it went to the wrong man but for it was close at a push napa but i wouldnt argue either way

 

But it's happening time and again. I just told a mate who's involved in online betting about the odds being so wide and he reckoned if it was horseracing no bookie would pay out a penny until there was some serious enquiries made.

 

Quit defending this shite. McDonnell landed at 13%, thirteen ****ing percent. I doubt if you could find a great memorable punch he landed all night...because he didn't. He didn't even outwork Napa greatly so there was no excuse, it was utter utter balls as usual.

 

Disgraceful commentary from Watt and Smith, they had already decided Napa was going to win before the first bell.

 

Hagman if you believe the wrong man won why the **** are you crying so much about other people complaining ? Are you a judging god ? Could it not be possible that other people had the man YOU HAD WINNING winning by a bit of a wider margin ? You bleat on about people not knowing boxing but if you were so clued up you'd know that this thing is happening more and more frequently in the UK and it's starting to get peoples backs up

 

Apparently you can't win a fight any more if you arnt the most aggresive guy in the ring.

Shame, last time I heard boxing was about hitting and not being hit rather than missing and getting hit.

I had it Napa 116-112 but it was clear cut, there is no way throwing punches and missing beats skill. It is a disgrace.