Pacquiao vs De la Hoya was a CATCHWEIGHT FIGHT

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by B-Flu, Jan 24, 2010.


Page 6 of 12
  1. Breakdown

    Breakdown Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,894
    0
    Nov 24, 2008
    Damn, too early for this ****
     
    Breakdown, Jan 25, 2010
    Breakdown, Jan 25, 2010
    #76
  2. B-Flu

    B-Flu Member Full Member

    226
    0
    Jan 7, 2010

    If the fight was signed at 145 why did Pac try to say DLH rigged the scales?????? Why did he say he went to his dressing room and weighed his self and he was heavier on his on scales Smart Guy??????
     
    B-Flu, Jan 25, 2010
    B-Flu, Jan 25, 2010
    #77
  3. PBA

    PBA Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,670
    5
    Jan 11, 2010
    yeah. Manny's yet to fight a legitimate welterweight match at the regular limit.
     
    PBA, Jan 25, 2010
    PBA, Jan 25, 2010
    #78
  4. Abdullah

    Abdullah Boxing Junkie banned

    8,257
    12
    Dec 2, 2008
    You are really stupid. I challenge you to present any documentation that this fight was, in fact, a catchweight fight. You can't! Because it wasn't! Let it go. Find something else to do with your life. For the last time, OSCAR WEIGHED IN AT 145 lbs. ON HIS OWN! No contract dictated that.
     
    Abdullah, Jan 25, 2010
    Abdullah, Jan 25, 2010
    #79
  5. B-Flu

    B-Flu Member Full Member

    226
    0
    Jan 7, 2010

    I put something inacurate on there. In fact it was supposedly contracted at 147. But it was still considered a catch weight fight because Oscar was going down And Pac was going up...
     
    B-Flu, Jan 25, 2010
    B-Flu, Jan 25, 2010
    #80
  6. horst

    horst Guest

    :lol::lol::lol::patsch:patsch:patsch

    What a spastic. If you are going to make such a ***** thread, at least know the facts first. The Pac-Oscar fight was at the 147-pound welterweight limit. Oscar weighed in at 145 because he ****ed up making the weight.

    F-f-f-f-f-f-ail!
     
    horst, Jan 25, 2010
    horst, Jan 25, 2010
    #81
  7. RJD

    RJD Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,782
    0
    Dec 23, 2007
    :lol:

    Time to create a new account.
     
    RJD, Jan 25, 2010
    RJD, Jan 25, 2010
    #82
  8. EricGN

    EricGN Active Member Full Member

    763
    7
    May 4, 2009

    OMG, you are making it worst. Do you even know what boxing is? The fact was, the contract said that the fight will be at 147. It was De La Hoya's fault that he weigh in at 145, Pacquiao was 142. I don't really understand your logic here. Even a 12 years old can understand this.
     
    EricGN, Jan 25, 2010
    EricGN, Jan 25, 2010
    #83
  9. ]V[ooSeKnUcKLeS

    ]V[ooSeKnUcKLeS YAHHHHH Full Member

    4,115
    4
    Mar 10, 2009

    :hi: *******. Waving can either mean hello and goodbye, in the case of the TS it means goodbye for that atrocious post. LOL @ you saying I'm a floydette. I have never defended Mayweather but nuthuggers like you can't see I'm an unbiased fan of the sport. All you can do is bash and hate on me because I simply said Manny should've taken the damn blood test. Just because I am all for tougher PED testing in the sport, *******s (like yourself) automatically assume I'm a floydette. Now, you either get off Pacquiao's nuts or mines but you only get to pick one. ***** :hi::hi::hi::hi::hi::hi::hi::hi::hi::hi::hi::hi:
     
    ]V[ooSeKnUcKLeS, Jan 25, 2010
    ]V[ooSeKnUcKLeS, Jan 25, 2010
    #84
  10. theHawtness

    theHawtness Active Member Full Member

    1,321
    0
    Apr 2, 2007
    :patsch

    it was signed at 147, at welterweight!
     
    theHawtness, Jan 25, 2010
    theHawtness, Jan 25, 2010
    #85
  11. J.E.Cash

    J.E.Cash Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,302
    8
    May 5, 2009
    Jumping weight classes is NOT a catchweight!!! A catchweight is contracting at a weight between division limits. For example, the Division Limit for WW is 147, but Manny and Cotto put in the CONTRACT that they would fight at 145 (2 pounds less than the division limit).

    It's only a catchweight if it is added to the contract. Coming in less on their own, moving up to a new division, or moving down to a lower division are not considered catchweights.

    Get It???
     
    J.E.Cash, Jan 25, 2010
    J.E.Cash, Jan 25, 2010
    #86
  12. lfc18titles

    lfc18titles Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,988
    0
    Dec 11, 2009
    i feel sorry for this thread creator, he clearly made a total fool himself and got his logic totally wrong

    now he will be humiliated at every thread he posts at, kinda like that guy who said khan wont be a top boxer because his private parts look too shrunk up during a weigh in lol
     
    lfc18titles, Jan 25, 2010
    lfc18titles, Jan 25, 2010
    #87
  13. saul_ir34

    saul_ir34 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,549
    0
    May 6, 2007
    basically it was kind of a catch weight with a legit weight class.
     
    saul_ir34, Jan 25, 2010
    saul_ir34, Jan 25, 2010
    #88
  14. Brickhaus

    Brickhaus Packs the house Full Member

    22,296
    5
    Mar 14, 2007
    It's not like Oscar even moved down a full weight class though. He fought Forbes at a catchweight of 150. He had to lose 3 more pounds than he did for the Forbes fight.
     
    Brickhaus, Jan 25, 2010
    Brickhaus, Jan 25, 2010
    #89
  15. Powerman55

    Powerman55 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,295
    0
    Nov 26, 2008
    Give me a break. :patsch
     
    Powerman55, Jan 25, 2010
    Powerman55, Jan 25, 2010
    #90
Page 6 of 12