[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9R7IMsOiftE[/ame] Burns, no more than 5'7" and 178 pounds, was made the underdog against Australia's Bill Squires who was coming off a 20 consecutive knockout streak in the 'Land Down Under'. Squires was considered too big, too strong, for Burns and that only Jim Jeffries stood a chance at beating Squires. The result was one of the fastest knockouts in history of boxing. Burns was a 10-1 underdog and he kayoed Squires inside 1:30 of the first round. Amazing stuff. Its sad people remember Burns for the loss to Johnson, but not for his exploits at middleweight, light heavyweight and early heavyweight championship reign. He was the first to truly challenge the world.
Burns is terribly underated, as are a few other hw champs. Guess to many you are just as much worth as the outcome of your most prominent fight. This fights also proves that it doesn´t mean anything if you look incredible against mediocre opponents when you step up to the real deals.
Burns was to meet Squires twice more ,on two different continents . Carrying him a few rounds in both fights before dispatching him. Jeffries is the referee in the fight shown he does not look that heavy ,but of course this is 1907 ,and he did not meet Johnson for another 3 years.
Squires was not coming of 20 consecutive KO's at all.. 8 in fact. Burns being a 10-1 underdog is the sort of rubbish you'd hear in a Cayton narrated documentary.
Squires previous 2 fights had been no dec' s against Arthur Cripps a 4 and a 6 rounder ,both went the distance. Previous to this, Squires had amassed an eleven ko streak. Squires actually weighed less than Burns for their California fight ,[posted] ,he was 180lbs to Burns 181lbs.
Sorry for the mistakes, however, it cant be denied that Squires was considered Australia's best man and was figured to be the favorite and demolish Burns easily. Squires had a impressive kayo streak by that era's standards, considering most fights ended in no decisions and no contests. Also, to say Burns challengers were weak is a bit misguided. Jem Roche's record is incomplete, as some have discovered that the Irishman had nearly 30 fights. The same goes for many of Burns title defense opponents. Bill Lang was mere fodder for Burns, who was another great Australian fighter. Gunner Moir didnt stand a chance either, and Moir kayoed such men as Billy Wells. It makes me wonder, sometimes, had Burns given Sam McVey the shot instead of Johnson, would he have beaten big Sam, and if so, would there even have been a Jack Johnson to remember?
Burns looks quality in this footage, I've liked it for some time. Didn't realise he'd beaten Lang; would be interesting to see if he did any better than Langford, who looks good in the footage of him obliteratign Lang.
Burns fought Squires and Lang in Australia, after which he defended his title against Jack Johnson. I believe that is how it went, that or he just fought Lang and then fought Johnson. One of the two.
I think whats amazing about the footage, really, is the enormity of Jeffries in comparison to not only Burns but to Squires. Jeffries wasn't fat or anything, he was just gigantic in height and bulk beside of them. The man truly was big for the era.
Squires was probably not a 10-to-1 favorite but he did a remarkable job marketing himself to the press http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=YrsaAAAAIBAJ&sjid=v0gEAAAAIBAJ&pg=6402,5269085 http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=FwsbAAAAIBAJ&sjid=z0gEAAAAIBAJ&pg=6097,556955 http://query.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=950CE5D8133EE033A25757C0A9619C946697D6CF http://news.google.com/newspapers?i...AAAIBAJ&dq=bill squires burns&pg=5454,3813602 http://news.google.com/newspapers?i...AAAIBAJ&dq=bill squires burns&pg=4978,6374814 There are numerous articles of Squires talking up how great he is. Even Jim Jeffries said he would come out of retirement to face him: http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=8AkbAAAAIBAJ&sjid=ykgEAAAAIBAJ&pg=1236,6148181 In the end he turned out to be a "false alarm": http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=QRUbAAAAIBAJ&sjid=y0gEAAAAIBAJ&pg=1899,608302 So Burns deserves a lot of credit for putting an end to the hype inside a single round of fighting.
Didn't know Jeffries had considered Burns as a possible come back opponent. I do know however that Squires originally called out Jeffries, for the "real" championship of the world and Jeffries laughed in his face. Squires then took on Burns and was kayoed in one round, and later became Burns sparring partner and was given two more shots at Burns, both kayo losses.
Yeah, Jeffries looks gigantic in there but to me he also looks overweight by quite a few pounds. Burns was fierce when he had his opponent hurt. :good
Sorry McVey, Squires actual record prior to Burns reads like this, working back through his record... 1906 KO 1 Mike Williams Melbourne. KO 1 Bill Smith Melbourne. KO 1 Peter Kling Melbourne. KO 3 Tim Murphy Melbourne. Aust H/W title KO 1 Ed Williams Melbourne. 1905 KO 7 Peter Felix Sydney. KO 3 Dick Kernick Melbourne. KO 4 Tom Fennessey Melbourne. W/Pts6 Jack Goggings Wyalong. KO 6 Bill Smith Wyalong. KO 1 Pat Farley Newcastle. KO 1 Peter Felix Sydney. 1904 L/F8 Arthur Cripps W/F 11 Peter Felix W/F 4 Starlight W/F 4 Mick Ryan KO 2 Bill Heckenberg KO 3 Starlight KO 3 Mick Ryan KO 1 Jack Tucker KO 2 Tom Ireland 1903 D/6 Bob Hilderbrand W/15 Jerry O'Toole KO 1 Bob Hilderbrand KO 4 Jack Briston KO 3 Andy Walsh 1902 KO 3 Joe Sullivan KO 2 Peter Mills KO 2 Jack Lanagan Ko 3 Bill Costello.