Will you rank PBF No.1 in P4P in case Pac loses to Clottey?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by watsinango, Jan 27, 2010.


  1. watsinango

    watsinango Active Member Full Member

    1,495
    0
    Feb 17, 2008
    PBF instantly claimed the No.2 spot after a mediocre come back performance. By simply challenging SSM, he will be installed to No. 1 spot.
     
  2. pauliemayweathe

    pauliemayweathe Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,995
    0
    Dec 27, 2007
    are u ******ed?:happy
     
  3. eze

    eze Everybody Know Me Full Member

    45,885
    3
    Aug 7, 2004
    mediocre?

    rofl.
     
  4. Jacory Harris

    Jacory Harris I'm a gorilla I'm a dawg! Full Member

    7,906
    32
    Dec 30, 2009
    WTF are you babbling about? Floyd is already P4P #1 in most of the boxing world's eyes. He came back and utterly destroyed and dominated the #2 P4P guy in Marques. Something that PacGwire couldn't even do at two failed attempts.
     
  5. Kel1981

    Kel1981 P4P No.1 Full Member

    9,561
    9
    Oct 19, 2008
  6. Kel1981

    Kel1981 P4P No.1 Full Member

    9,561
    9
    Oct 19, 2008
    Yeah P4P no.2 was a lightweight thought....silly boy.
     
  7. KO KIDD

    KO KIDD Loyal Member Full Member

    31,342
    7,225
    Oct 5, 2009
    This
     
  8. keure

    keure Active Member Full Member

    893
    0
    May 9, 2009
    when pbf makes jmm look like it was his first day in a boxing ring and connects on 60 percent of his shots and holds jmm to a 12 percent connect rate while toying with him, its considered mediocre, but 18 months earlier the same jmm gave pac a life and death close fight that pac arguably lost in most spectators eyes but pac's performance was brilliant, this is an example of more illogical unintelligent bs from pac fans
     
  9. keure

    keure Active Member Full Member

    893
    0
    May 9, 2009
    the same light weight that pac couldnt handle
     
  10. eliqueiros

    eliqueiros Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,344
    7
    Oct 25, 2007
    Not automatically. If he faces Mosley and beats him then yes. If he does not face mosley I don't think a fighter that avoids those high calibre fights deserves to be ranked in the p4p top ten at all. If PBF faces and loses to Mosley then the question gets tougher and more interesting. If they both lost their upcoming fights then who deserves #1 ranking? I would say yes, as facing the #1 ranked welter even if losing would have been more ambitious than facing Clottey.
     
  11. keure

    keure Active Member Full Member

    893
    0
    May 9, 2009
    have any pac fans come up with any legit responses to the facts that i posted yesterday about their boy that shut the forum down and silenced long time pac nuthuggers like luke o and bladerunner, because when you present facts to these people they start cringing inside because they know they have no defense but to resort to their ussual opinionated assumption based ignorance
     
  12. haglerforever

    haglerforever Member Full Member

    392
    1
    Dec 6, 2009
    mediocre ,You gotta be kidding,JMM won more rounds against your boy Pacquiao than Pacquiao did. Mayweather was masterfull ,he shut JMM out.Marques barely touched him,offensively Floyd was measured thats how the man fights.Hit & don`t get hit.He aint fighting for the fans he fights for the W.As a fan I also would like to see him a hell of a lot more active with his hands.......
     
  13. eliqueiros

    eliqueiros Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,344
    7
    Oct 25, 2007
    Shutting out a fighter coming up two divisions when he had barely entered 135 to fight a full blown welter who did not even bother to make the agreed upon weight is what it is, nothing more. A good win. But Pac fought the better Marquez.
     
  14. Asterion

    Asterion Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,459
    20
    Feb 5, 2005
    Mayweather's comeback performance was not mediocre.
     
  15. Twirdman

    Twirdman Active Member Full Member

    538
    0
    Nov 24, 2009
    This is ******ed. Ok Pac and JMM both lightweights when they fought. So even if you say Pac couldn't handle JMM which is crap you have to realize its not the same thing. Simply because someone can make a weight doesn't mean they should fight there. Simply because a guy can make a weight doesn't mean he should fight there.

    Look at Hatton guy routenly baloons up to 170+ between bouts does that mean he should fight at those weights, hell no. Now I know its not that bad but basically anyone will tell you that JMM doesn't belong in these weight classes.

    So yeah JMM gave Pac problems when JMM was at his best weight and Mayweather beat JMM at a weight there is no way in hell he belongs at. There is the difference.