The Kid Gavilan Appreciation Thread

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by GPater11093, Jan 31, 2010.


  1. GPater11093

    GPater11093 Barry Full Member

    38,034
    90
    Nov 10, 2008
    Afew months ago Kid Gavilan was a fighter I never shined too, I never thought him to be as great as many claimed and I did not think he looked too good on film.

    Now after reviewing his career I have come to an entirely different conclusion and can see a legitimate case for having him as the 2nd best Welterweight ever or even top.

    Heres a list of contenders, champs etc... he beat *Welterweight unless otherwise stated

    Walter Cartier (Middleweight)
    Gene Burton (Middleweight)
    Tommy Bell
    Ike Williams
    Rocky Castellani (Middleweight)
    Beau Jack
    Laurent Dauthille (Middleweight)
    Billy Graham x 2
    Robert Villemain (Middleweight)
    Gene Hairstone (Middleweight)
    Tony Janiro x 2 1KO (Middleweight)
    Paddy Young (Middleweight)
    Johnny Bratton x 2
    Fitzie Pruden x 2
    Bobby Dykes
    Gil Turner
    Chuck Davey
    Tiger Jones
    Carmen Basilio
    Gaspar Ortega

    Pretty impressive list of fighters. One thing to note is that the amount of Middleweights defeated, that is very impressive for a career Welterweight, who never really moved up and campaigned at Middleweight. The Welterweight division was practically ruled whilst he held the title and he was definitly a leading Middleweight contender.

    However you should note the amont of losses he picked up, mostly controversial, which should perhaps mark him down.


    On film Gavilan is definitly one of the best Welterweights we have footage of. He is perhaps the definition of a 'Ring General' as he really did controll a ring with his tremendous judgement of distance and ability to play the 'judges'.

    His accuracy for me is unrivalled among the Welterweights his long whipping hooks and uppercuts as well as his underrated jab and straight were deadly accurate and stinging punches. He put them well together into blistering combiantions and often used these tremondously speedy combinations at precise times in which to 'steal' a round. However, I feel his jab was underviewed.

    Apart from his technically correct boxing form he also was a master of feints as he used his, at times, unorthodox punching technique to lead on opponents and used clever movement, and steps to create openings and set up punches. He even feted wit his feet and could lay claim to creating the Ali shuffle aswell as the Bolo punch, as I am sure you are all well aware of his bolo punch.

    Aswell as all of the previously mentioned stuff, he had tremendous head movement often bobbing and weaving and slipping. He also was extremly talented physically with speed and a granite chin, some cite that he has a lack of power but I disagree as mentioned above and by McGrain regulary he was a 'stinging' puncher.


    Well that is my view on the Kid. Anyone have any alternative stance on the Kid? or want to comment on my view? Or just any general thoughts on the Kid?
     
    joe brown likes this.
  2. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,788
    47,642
    Mar 21, 2007
    Funnily enough, i'm in a similar boat. It's taken me 20 years to warm up to him! Now I think he's epic, a head to head monster. I agree with you that he is one of the best filmed welterweights. You could count on one hand the # of welters I pick over him.
     
  3. GPater11093

    GPater11093 Barry Full Member

    38,034
    90
    Nov 10, 2008
    He's taken me a while to get into (no as long as you) not sure why though.

    Definitly a H2H monster, I pick Robinson, Burley to beat him convincingly over a series

    and Napoles, Basilio, Duran and Leonard to be about level with him in a series.
     
  4. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,788
    47,642
    Mar 21, 2007
    I think he knots Leonard up badly. I think if they fought you'd have repeatedly unsatisfactory decisions, whichever way they went.

    Burley beats him.
     
  5. GPater11093

    GPater11093 Barry Full Member

    38,034
    90
    Nov 10, 2008
    Good point on Leonard, I just think Leonard is adaptable enough to figure out Gavilan at points of the fight and do enough to win rounds. Like you say there will be some bad decisions.

    Burley does beat him.

    One guy I think could beat Gavilan in a 1 fight series is Wilfrd Benitez. Has the defensive abilities to limit Gavilan's output and Gavilan isnt a massive puncher that can dent his chin in 1 shot IMO. Just not too sure how the feints would go down with Benitez.
     
  6. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล Full Member

    82,423
    1,464
    Sep 7, 2008
    Gavilan is one of my favourite fighters.

    Riveting fighter: so many tools in his toolbox, iron chin, intelligent....I mean a all-round quality fighter, can envision him outboxing some of the best and having tear-ups with the toughest.

    The Cuban Hawk vs Montreal Duran is a frightening prospect.
     
  7. GPater11093

    GPater11093 Barry Full Member

    38,034
    90
    Nov 10, 2008
    Definitly, what do you think Duran would do that would trouble Gavilan?
     
  8. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล Full Member

    82,423
    1,464
    Sep 7, 2008
    Well Duran his own intensity, accuracy and ability to be slick or mix it up.

    I just feel either guy can break the others rhythm so they would just engage each other in one of the greatest tear ups of all time. I'm being completely selfish, it would be a war. And the boxing that would take place would be sublime, both men trying to get the other out of position to land the telling blows before coming together as building collase around them :lol:
     
  9. GPater11093

    GPater11093 Barry Full Member

    38,034
    90
    Nov 10, 2008
    Haha

    It would be a good fight but I could also seeing it being quite cagey.
     
  10. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล Full Member

    82,423
    1,464
    Sep 7, 2008
    I see Duran edging it on points purely on the basis he hits harder.

    But I'm glad the myth that Gavilan was a feather fist is nit perpetuated on here. I mean, The Ring says Floyd has superior power. I don't see it, the author must surely have been Boxrecing.
     
  11. GPater11093

    GPater11093 Barry Full Member

    38,034
    90
    Nov 10, 2008
    Gavilan's lack of power is due to his low KO %, tell Tony Janiro or Walter cartier (Middleweights) he hit like a *****!
     
  12. ricardinho

    ricardinho Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,241
    3
    May 17, 2009

    Gavilan is credited with inventing the bolo punch.... he gave some slick boxers a nice tool to use
     
  13. GPater11093

    GPater11093 Barry Full Member

    38,034
    90
    Nov 10, 2008
    Ceferino Garcia used the Bolo punch before him I beleive. The actual bolo punch IMO is just showy but the actual angle of the punch is an effective blow and when used without the spin can be effective.

    BTW for sheer ballsy, over the top showman ship i think it is round 4 of Gavilan vs Bratton II
     
  14. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล Full Member

    82,423
    1,464
    Sep 7, 2008
    So it wasn't at all influenced by Gavilan swinging his machete through sugar cane?

    'You should love your parents....'
     
  15. GPater11093

    GPater11093 Barry Full Member

    38,034
    90
    Nov 10, 2008
    It could have easily been as would Gavilan had access to films of Garcia at the time of his early career.

    'Don't do drugs'
    'I want a society where we can all love each other.'