Floyd vs. ATG Welters (Correction of The Ring's stupid one)

The article to correct Gavin Evans' blatantly biased for Floyd article.

http://www.thesweetscience.com/boxi...n-mayweather-versus-greatest-welters-history/:deal

 

That article is also biased.

 

Only if you like Floyd so much.

The writer has based the mythical matchups on Floyd's actual performances against true welterweights--because these are all-time great welterweights.

 

http://www.thesweetscience.com/boxing-author.php?author=23

 

And that's supposed to prove that Floyd wins these mythical matchups against ATG welters?

 

Just sayin the writer is biased. Take it with a grain of salt.

 

one article says mayweather wins some lose some. the article u present says he loses them all, hmmmmmm get out of the closet homo, mayweather KO'S u easily keyboard warrior

 

This guy knows his stuff. Neither Floyd or Pac are beating the elite atg welters.

 

Opinions man it`s all just opinions.....We will know a little more May 2

 

Nice read and insights.

 

I'm a keyboard warrior because...I presented this article to ESB? :huh

Hmm, you get suspicious because this article says Mayweather loses 0-10 against these all-time great welterweights, and The Ring article says he scores 6-4? Wow, what could have caused such a discrepancy?

Mayweather for the record has fought only two natural welterweights in Judah and Baldomir, and a junior middleweight-at-the time dela Hoya. Because of this, Gavin Evans thinks he wins six of these mythical matchups. :yep

 

:good

 

While Floyd may improve his standing legacy-wise with a win over Mosley, do you think a victory there should alter the results of these ATG mythical matchups?

 

I wrote an article like this, only I was honest and admitted that floyd would destroy every ATG within 30 lbs of him.
He is the best fighter to ever put on a pair of gloves.

 

They are just opinions ..I dont totally agree with either article but this one is certainly better researched and written.