-*- Floyd asked for a Rematch Clause if he loses -*-

yes
cant be sure with who but its been mentioned before

its an INSURANCE POLICY against a cut , bad decision etc

all big fights should have them in my opinion

 

yeah pretty much run of the mill now in big fights but not often used

 

Old news and no big deal really.

 

i dont like these rematch clauses. that means if we see mosley beat mayweather he wont be able to fight pac next, which will be the fight everyone wants

 

uhh yea...there's no rematch clause.

 

there is a rematch clause, and it's no new thing. floyd has had rematch clauses in almost every big fight he has had.

 

"It's done: Richard Schaefer just told SI.com that Floyd Mayweather has signed a contract to face Shane Mosley on May 1st in Las Vegas"

"Contrary to reports, there is no automatic rematch clause for either fighter in the contract."

"Rising Mexican star Saul Alvarez will be on the undercard. GBP President Oscar De La Hoya will conduct a separate press tour w/Alvarez."

[url]http://twitter.com/ChrisMannixSI[/url]

 

Look how tiny Hayes head and neck look in that pic

 

Rematch clause is good. It means he is not gonna ***** out if he takes an L.

 

No way?!

 

A rematch clause is rare in big fights if someone is knocked out early-they usually happen if a tko/ko happens late in the fight. It also depends on who the bigger name is also. PAv/JT...Norris/Brown etc...

 

Rematch clauses have been standard practice for huge fights for over fifteen years.

****; you think Rahman would have fought Lewis again if he'd had the choice? -- And Lewis had to go to court to make sure Rahman didn't lose the titles to somebody else in the meantime.

Like somebody else said, you don't often see them exercised because usually the person asking for them wins anyway, but they're usually there.