Should be interesting..I think Wlad goess for an early KO just to shut some mouths. Chambers is talented, but even that won't be enough once he feels the power.
So if it's on PPV but not on HBO and ESPN, who is going to broadcast it then?:huh Or do you mean HBO PPV?
Hey, PPV is better than nothing. This is the most (potentially) competitive HW title bout in years, if there was to be one that is PPV worthy, this is it. All the people whining about how the heavyweight division is supposed to be the most glamorous and prominent in the sport are seriously now going to snub a world heavyweight title fight between the #1 guy and the top credible, realistic* challenger? (*thus excluding big brother) Hysterical. People buy J.C. ****ing Chavez Jr. Pay Per Views. Klitschko vs. Chambers gets my hard earned dollars no matter what the undercard's like. At least it's on some form of TV.
Just because I buy JCC Jr events when I'm under the influence doesn't mean I have to buy Wlad fights sober.
People on here who bought Valuev vs Haye which was one of the most worthless garbage fights ever are complaining about this being on PPV? :roflatsch
But by the time I'm drunk enough to order, the fight will either be over or the overall expense of the evening will far exceed what's being promised here. It's a wicked web to weave.
Because if Chambers actually gives it a game effort and doesn't turn in a negative performance like his countryman and fellow jabbing specialist recently did against a Klitschko, he could be the first to actually outbox the post-Steward version of Wladimir, for a couple of rounds anyway. That's IF Chambers gives it a game effort, bringing his highest level of focus before and during the match without mentally shitting the bed. That's why I said qualified it with "(potentially)". :good