Can You Justify Placing Morales In A Top 50?

Guess work here for me as i've never done more than a top 10 and i wasn't really happy with that but no i don't think he'd make my top 50, i wouldn't destroy someone for having him there but i reckon i'd have him a little lower.

 

I dont know why I keep replying to these list threads...they do my head in.

But the answer for me is a resounding no...Ive seen credible lists thats have Erik outside the 100. Personally I think I have him 80-90.

So top 50 cannot be argued IMO.

 

Ok i maybe i exagerrated on top 50 but ill stick with 60. I have Tyson around 50 and id put Morales a little behind him.

 

Top 35 if he retired after the first pacquiao fight

 

Sure, top (1)50 is justifiable

 

How old are you? And have you ever boxed? :yep

 

:rofl

 

But you watch fights on Youtube so your opinion means nothing.

 

Ive never tried anything more than a top 10 but Im guessing its a debateable thing placing Morales in a top 50 & if its debateable then it can probably be justified.

Im certainly not gonna complain if he makes someones top 50, he`s my fav fighter & I always felt he gets underrated as in a skilled sense because of the nature of most of his fights.... he was a regular top 10 p4per all the way thru his entire prime + even a little past his prime, at his best he was in contention for the no1 spot on lots of lists, he fought everyone worth fighting thru 3 weight classes & reached ATG status in his best class, the 122 lb division.

The guy was a brilliant fighter & has a very good record/resume so its certainly not ridiculous to put him in a top 50.

Thats my view.