Rate these 5 guys in order of greatness?

In a h2h sense hes most probably the best and for them 3 years he was excellent but therein lies the problem his peak was relatively short and the other guys beat better opposition over a longer period thats why hes last for me.

 

Yeah, thats fair enough pal. Just seems the concensous, which I didn't think it would be.

 

1.LaMotta
2.Zarate
3.Morales
4.Tyson
4=Trinidad

 

Believe me i heard alot of his BS on the General Forum, but i actually like his ATG list better than most that ive seen here. Of course theres some stuff i disagree with.

But **** if i put up a list id probably disagree with it next month.

 

You are beginning to remind me of your buddy Mcclovin:bart

 

Actually that was a good post Flea and i agree with almost all of it.

Even though you been talking a lot of **** on your other thread:bbb

 

All in good fun mate :good

 

I'm just saying that I think you overrate Lopez, just I'm not as much as a **** of Fleaman and wont start to insult you. :good

 

Jake LaMotta - Deep resume, best win of the lot by a mile
Erik Morales - Great Super Bantamweight, and left a mark in every division he entered. Barrera and Pacquiao wins are spectacular.
Carlos Zarate - Great Bantamweight reign, never achieved anything upwards of that.
Felix Trinidad - Successful at Multiple weights, but came up short a few times...and badly. Never recovered.
Mike Tyson- Beat not one great prime Heavyweight, was dominant for 5 years.

 

Carlos Zarate shouldn't be mentioned in the same breath as the other 4.

 

Why?

 

:good

 

Was Morales's win over Barrera really "spectacular"? :huh

 

Yup. :good

 

You think losing a disappointing fight by 1 point is "spectacular" then, as I am aware of your scorecard and opinion re that one??