The OFFICIAL Whats the point!!!!!! Match ups thread..... 2010

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by brown bomber, Jan 22, 2010.


Page 2 of 5
  1. brown bomber

    brown bomber 2010 Poster of the Year Full Member

    30,856
    17
    Jul 1, 2006
    Its a vacant title fight against an inactive opponent, coming off a one round KO loss- he wins in one 'who cares!' he loses and its a disaster.... thus its a pointless match up... i understand that you don't really understand boxing and how the sport works but hope this helps...

    ... Anyway shouldn't you be masturbating over gay porn?:lol:
     
    brown bomber, Feb 13, 2010
    brown bomber, Feb 13, 2010
    #16
  2. brown bomber

    brown bomber 2010 Poster of the Year Full Member

    30,856
    17
    Jul 1, 2006
    Wow busy night, Jamie Cox 13-0 (7) vs Micheal Frontin 2-6-1 (0) serious? Not a terrible fighter but what the **** is Cox fighting him for?
     
    brown bomber, Feb 13, 2010
    brown bomber, Feb 13, 2010
    #17
  3. Martbowski

    Martbowski The Fight Show Full Member

    840
    0
    Jan 17, 2009
    It's almost Valentines Day - I'll be taking for once.
     
    Martbowski, Feb 13, 2010
    Martbowski, Feb 13, 2010
    #18
  4. brown bomber

    brown bomber 2010 Poster of the Year Full Member

    30,856
    17
    Jul 1, 2006
    :lol::rofl

    Darn it!!!
     
    brown bomber, Feb 13, 2010
    brown bomber, Feb 13, 2010
    #19
  5. skel1983

    skel1983 Guest


    Cox looks shite tonight, the guy he is fighting has been a good test. Deffo not pointless.
     
    skel1983, Feb 13, 2010
    skel1983, Feb 13, 2010
    #20
  6. Beeston Brawler

    Beeston Brawler Comical Ali-egedly Full Member

    46,399
    15
    Jan 9, 2008
    The fact that someone sports an Audley Harrison avatar disturbs me :-(
     
    Beeston Brawler, Feb 13, 2010
    Beeston Brawler, Feb 13, 2010
    #21
  7. brown bomber

    brown bomber 2010 Poster of the Year Full Member

    30,856
    17
    Jul 1, 2006
    Ok, if he won in one round by triple ko would you have been impressed? Me neither... the match is irrelevant and thus is pointless.

    Frontin has lost to serial loser Alex Spitko- the match up has zero worth, no wonder Cox has gone off the boil after looking sensational.

    Cox or Groves looking shite is not improtant... going in the match means nothing.
     
    brown bomber, Feb 13, 2010
    brown bomber, Feb 13, 2010
    #22
  8. hagman1989

    hagman1989 the boxing site , try it Full Member

    8,284
    1
    Dec 13, 2008
    a few of your pointless matchups have been rather more competative than your billing would sugest

    i say stop making stupid posts
     
    hagman1989, Feb 13, 2010
    hagman1989, Feb 13, 2010
    #23
  9. skel1983

    skel1983 Guest


    How the **** is it irrelevant??

    Cox has/will learn alot from this experience of tonights fight alot more than hsi past few fights, he and his team will go back and see some flaws and see where he can improve, I dont see how a fight like this is pointless for a 13 fight pro who is getting 8 rounds under his belt??

    IMO this has been just what Cox needed, I think he has been believing his hype a little bit to much in his last few fights and calling the likes of Kell Brook can be put on hold for a while after this a very good fight for me and one which will benefit him loads for the future.
     
    skel1983, Feb 13, 2010
    skel1983, Feb 13, 2010
    #24
  10. brown bomber

    brown bomber 2010 Poster of the Year Full Member

    30,856
    17
    Jul 1, 2006
    Romanov - Murray
    Bognar - Gomez
    Devakov - Oliver
    Szabo - Matthews
    Catley - Galfi
    Epifancev - Jacobs
    Lockett - Tsarenko

    were all competitive... they were **** matches going into the fight... that you don't get the idea of the thread is your problem you thick ****. :thumbsup

    How about you shut the **** up:good
     
    brown bomber, Feb 13, 2010
    brown bomber, Feb 13, 2010
    #25
  11. TFFP

    TFFP The Eskimo

    45,002
    4
    Nov 28, 2007
    This thread was going well until you claimed there was no point in fighting for the European title.

    Even though Brancalion was ****, the point of the European title is it makes more money and it improves your ranking for world titles.
     
    TFFP, Feb 13, 2010
    TFFP, Feb 13, 2010
    #26
  12. skel1983

    skel1983 Guest

    Spitting your dummy out now?
     
    skel1983, Feb 13, 2010
    skel1983, Feb 13, 2010
    #27
  13. hagman1989

    hagman1989 the boxing site , try it Full Member

    8,284
    1
    Dec 13, 2008

    find someone else that disagrees with me
     
    hagman1989, Feb 13, 2010
    hagman1989, Feb 13, 2010
    #28
  14. brown bomber

    brown bomber 2010 Poster of the Year Full Member

    30,856
    17
    Jul 1, 2006
    Its irrelevant because he is boxing a light welterweight who has had nine fights and won two.... He should be addressing these issues in sparring not in an arena full of people.

    Had he won the fight in one or two rounds would you have been suprised? Would you have cared? No wonder he is looking **** and making mistakes, he's fighting one over-matched unknown opponent after another.

    Had he lost the fight he would be written off, win impressively and no one cares.. look bad and its a good match?:huh I don't get your logic.
     
    brown bomber, Feb 13, 2010
    brown bomber, Feb 13, 2010
    #29
  15. brown bomber

    brown bomber 2010 Poster of the Year Full Member

    30,856
    17
    Jul 1, 2006
    Sorry bit harsh with the reply had a few fosters...:D I'd find loads... the matches i've listed were wastes of time for everyone involved.
     
    brown bomber, Feb 13, 2010
    brown bomber, Feb 13, 2010
    #30
Page 2 of 5