I agree he didn't fight *everyone* but he did not have mediocre opposition. 19 world champions, a heavyweight champion, Hopkins and Toney in their primes. The reason the DM fight didn't happen was the obvious hometown bias factor which Jones had already suffered in Korea - and which gave DM a gift win by dodgy DW in one of his title fights, by the way. Germany is notorious for dodgy hometown decisions. By the way, this idea that Hopkins was not in his prime is rubbish. He was 28 and had just had a 20+ fight winning streak, he was knocking people out left right and centre. After the Jones loss he was a dominant middleweight with a 12 year undefeated record and another 20+ wins. The only reason you say it was not his prime is because Jones beat him! If Jones had lost, Hopkins would have had like a 45 fight undeafeated streak and you would have been saying it was his prime all along. This is typical "pick and chose" boxing logic. Saying Hopkins was not an ATG before the Jones fight is like saying that Ali wasn't a great before the Liston fight - or that Jones wasn't a great until the Hopkins fight. If Hopkins was not ATG then, neither was Jones.
So we can't say that Robinson would beat Clottey? That Ali would lick Chris Arreola? You're out of your ****ing mind.
How often did Hopkins and Toney land flush on his chin? I agree Roy had a dentable chin (not glass), this is the one legitimate complaint against his ability. Pep also had an average chin, so did Locche. To exploit an average chin, first you have to land on it. A lot of the complaints about his durability come from when he was older. Ali and Leonard also got brutalised in their mid/late 30s. And remember Roy has got off the deck to win, so he has been tested on the heart/durability side.
I don't rate his victory over Hopkins at all. Hopkins was as green as grass and he was a fighter who improved specifically with age. Toney was an impressive win but then Jones's sytlistic advantages are enormous (in hindsight).
1. It was uiversally recognised that fighting 2 of the top P4Pers of the era was being protected? Between Toney-McCallum (2years) he didnt go after all the big names he should have, after 1998 until 2003 there wasnt any massive fights. Plenty of good contenders/titlists but no greats 2. If anything Jones P4P opponents are better than Alis first career opponents, to say hes untested is setting a mighty high bar for 'tests', Monzon would also clasify as being untested by those standards 3. You can call MW Jones 'green' but he was already good enough to beat the 2 best of his era (including the Toney fight 1 fight afterhis last MW fight), and another 3 other world champs (total of 5), amongst other title challengers 4. Arguably his performances at 160 were better than anything we've seen from any MW in history 5. Jones was actually past prime at 33 against Woods and had slowed
28 in his physical prime, with about 100 amateur fights, 23 pro fights, and would go unbeaten for another 12years since arguably not losing since. Yet you rate Grebs or Jack Johnsons wins over pre-prime opponents with about 13 fights total Tell us what proof there is Hopkins wasnt prime again
Yea a slower Hopkins that throws 8 punches a round is better than a Hopkins who throws 60punches a round
I think Hopkins is being a little overated as to how great he became since the Jones fight on your part. Using the Taylor fights is a perfect example of that.
He might have been in his physical prime but he wasn't in his boxing prime. Hopkins got better post-Jones. Greb and Jack Johnson? He obviously became greater post Jones than he was pre-Jones. If Hopkins retires after the Jones fight he's a footnote.
His record at LHW I agree - but his record at SMW and MW is dominant (2 prime ATGs beaten), and his HW title is a great achievement. You also have to account for how *long* we went basically unbeaten (apart from the 1 DQ loss), it was pretty much a decade or so. I feel you underrated him on record - 19 champions beaten, remember. Ok the Hopkins fight wasn't a shutout, I overstated it. It was a clear victory where Jones was never troubled though. After thinking about it I have to agree about Spinks, I'd have him favoured over Roy H2H but not massively. But remember despite Roy's size, he clearly beat Ruiz at heavy. He showed his skills could offset his size disadvantage.