Calzaghe & Mayeather's CV / Resume , is there much difference ???

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by thewinfella, Feb 17, 2010.


  1. Grant1

    Grant1 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,823
    1
    Jun 13, 2007
    Da truth :deal
     
  2. Grant1

    Grant1 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,823
    1
    Jun 13, 2007
    :lol:
     
  3. dragor

    dragor Active Member Full Member

    526
    0
    Nov 7, 2009
    I explain shortly

    Mayweather beat 14th world champion , Calzaghe 7th

    thank you
     
  4. El Cepillo

    El Cepillo Baddest Man on the Planet Full Member

    17,221
    4
    Aug 29, 2008
    Mayweather's is clearly better and there is a big difference.
     
  5. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล Full Member

    82,426
    1,468
    Sep 7, 2008
    Mayweather continues to be overrated.
     
  6. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล Full Member

    82,426
    1,468
    Sep 7, 2008
    BOLD: Sure, Joe Louis was ****:deal

    LINED: I'd actually say there's a whole lot more weight-jumping nowadays due to there being a much larger number of weight classes and useless 'titles' to grab. Physically eveolved?!!?!? Look at Joe Gans' physique, and figure that he had to make weight ON THE DAY maybe once a month, and Gans is a figther who on film doesn't look that impressive.

    Think of the gloves they had to wear. They musta been tough, surely?

    Then you start to see how they worked. You're telling me this:
    [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5LSDYJOFp7Q[/ame]

    [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NRRYS9Rh7Bk&feature=related[/ame]


    Wouldn't be difficult for a fighter from any era? If you say not then you're a f'n moron, oh know wait, you are.

    On another note, how would our pampered fighters of today fare in a land where they had to weigh in on the same day, use smaller gloves (Calzaghe would be ****ED with his hands) and fight very regularly, often giving up weight and with far less strict referees.

    I think that boxing has regressed rather than progressed.

    Wonder what you'll reply with, something original like, Fleadick:lol:

    Knobhead.
     
  7. kosaros

    kosaros Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    26,593
    5
    Jul 21, 2008
    :lol: That's what I was thinking.

    http://www.eastsideboxing.com/forum/showthread.php?t=155182

    If this thread had any influence on the TS then I am sorry :yep

    Calzaghe is possibly a top 120-150 fighter of all-time - I don't think he is top 100 material.
     
  8. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล Full Member

    82,426
    1,468
    Sep 7, 2008
    Where would you have Floyd if he retired today Kos? And do you think there's anyone in my list (the page before I feel) that Floyd has achieved more than/is better than?
     
  9. kosaros

    kosaros Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    26,593
    5
    Jul 21, 2008
    Possibly about 70-80 for Mayweather.

    I had a glance at your list and although I'm no expert on the older fighters, no-one stood out as having done less than Mayweather. Maybe his record is comparable to RJJ's, but I still think RJJ trumps him in both his record and H2H ability.
     
  10. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล Full Member

    82,426
    1,468
    Sep 7, 2008
    Glad to see there are some sane minds around:D:good
     
  11. s23041983

    s23041983 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,180
    0
    Nov 12, 2008
    this is the most sensible post i have EVER read on esb :good
     
  12. icemax

    icemax Indian Red Full Member

    27,158
    2
    Apr 24, 2008
    The best british fighter ever? FFS :-(
     
  13. Dan684

    Dan684 Dave's Stepdad Full Member

    17,612
    3
    Feb 19, 2009
    The most sensible post on ESB contains the sentence "CALZAGHE NEVER DUCKED ANYONE THOUGH AND IS THE BEST BRITISH FIGHTER EVER IMO"

    I dont know if that makes you or him the bigger cretin :huh
     
  14. Beeston Brawler

    Beeston Brawler Comical Ali-egedly Full Member

    46,399
    15
    Jan 9, 2008
    [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yp_7_y-hjoA[/ame]


    :hi:
     
  15. thewinfella

    thewinfella The Golden Boy Full Member

    14,954
    0
    Jun 14, 2009
    Look man , you like watching the old tapes when fighters threw punches from there waist , you like the fact they fought on with broken jaws and broken necks , ok i get it !!!!!! , like i said you like the sports history .

    Well im not such a fan of the old times , i actually think its like watching a street fight with a referee in between them , i like the technicalities of the modern game , i like the cat and mouse of watching two world class fighters applying there trades .

    To say boxing has not evolved in the techincal area is ****in crazy i mean absolutley ****in crazy , your right in saying that the modern fighters would struggle in yesterdays conditions but lets reverse that and put the old style fighters in with todays top class fighters in these conditions , **** it aint worth thinkin about !!!!!!!!

    I am not one of these people who thinks that because a fighter had 200 fights , or fought for 50 world titles or fought in 11 different weight classes he has to rank all time higher than todays fighters , because i am a realist and i look back and think man imagine what todays Welterweight champ would do to him etc etc etc , look i just dont like the old fighters , i am a fan of the modern day boxing era at world class level thats me thats just my opinion .

    I did wanna scrap the insults and talk boxing with you , but i think you have taken my insults personally sorry mate but it aint personal !!!!!