Now that the dust has settled and floyd is facing the tougher comp......

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by freddy-wak, Feb 17, 2010.


  1. BOSTONREDSOX

    BOSTONREDSOX The Ghost Full Member

    2,048
    0
    Dec 10, 2007
    floyd put pac in a no win situation with the drug testing demands period
     
  2. bonds

    bonds Active Member Full Member

    828
    0
    Apr 1, 2006
    How would it be a no win for him if he took a blood test 14 days from the fight?
     
  3. Bill Butcher

    Bill Butcher Erik`El Terrible`Morales Full Member

    28,518
    82
    Sep 3, 2007
    Im not sure about the dirty thing, likely not would be my guess but nothing would suprise me on this one.

    I do feel however that Manny knows deep down he cant beat Mayweather & is content to avoid that fight as he`s enjoying his current fame & status as the p4p no1 (not to me tho, Floyd-Shane winner earns that **** automatically)

    Im positive that Pac backed out hoping that the reputation that both he & Floyd have amongst a lot of boxing fans would have the majority turn on Floyd, thankfully the majority see it for what it was, a ***** out job on Pacquiao`s part.
     
  4. horst

    horst Guest

    You're just so, so wrong. I just can't be arsed even trying to reason with such a hideously skewed perception.
     
  5. sdsfinest22

    sdsfinest22 Pound 4 Pound Full Member

    37,732
    1
    Apr 19, 2007
    NOT REALLY....U CANT OWN SOMEBODY WITH THE FACTS U USING...NOT EVEN USING FACTS..U SEEM TO BE JUST AN IDIOT..THE OTHER POSTER DONE PROVED YA ASS WRONG AND YOUR RESPONSE WAS GARBAGE...:deal:beat:mj
     
  6. LukeO

    LukeO Erik Morales is God Full Member

    37,866
    45
    Jun 30, 2007
    22 people are basing Manny Pacquiao being dirty on nothing?
    22 people are that ****ing dumb?

    How can you say "yes, he was on steroids"
    You idiots are the worst.

    People who are probably religious/think 9/11 was an inside job/believe tupac is alive/think the moon landing was a hoax:

    92sc300gte, bald_head_slick, bloodyglory, BoxingWM, dannylatics, divac, EL CABALLO, Furey, Gunns4hire, Jacory Harris, k1llu, kingmiller8282, Pinker182, PowerPuncher, Royal-T-Bag, Salty Dog, sdsfinest22, Silent_Assassin, Toopretty, Wolfticket, Zavy, zoomie
     
  7. bandeedo

    bandeedo Loyal Member Full Member

    36,057
    24,043
    Feb 19, 2007
    do you just ignore poll results and all the evidence to the contrary and just make up your own facts? the majority of fans see this for what it is. a crackhead talking **** without an ounce of proof and a few butthurt floyd fans or pac haters taking this crackhead and trying to make him believable.
     
  8. sdsfinest22

    sdsfinest22 Pound 4 Pound Full Member

    37,732
    1
    Apr 19, 2007
    AFTER 353246534635 EXCUSES I FINALLY CAME TO THE CONCLUSION THAT HE HIDING SOMETHING...CMON NOW...

    FIRST YOU SCARED OF NEEDLES

    THAN YOU DONT GIVE BLOOD WITHIN 30 DAYS

    THAN YOU DO GIVE BLOOD WITHIN 30 DAYS BUT NOT 24 BECAUSE A VIDEO SURFACED OF U GIVING BLOOD 24 DAYS BEFORE A FIGHT..

    THAN YOU'LL DO THE FIGHT BUT NOT WITH THE USADA..

    THAN AFTER THAT IS OUT OF THE USADA IS GONE, YOU STILL WONT TAKE IT CUZ THE COMMISSION DONT REQUIRE IT..

    I KNOW IF I REFUSED ANY DRUG TEST AT MY JOB AND INSTEAD QUIT (DONT HAVE THE OPTION TO "FIGHT SOMEONE ELSE") IT WOULD BE BECAUSE I KNEW DAMN WELL I WAS DIRTY:deal
     
  9. Marnoff

    Marnoff Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,227
    27
    Feb 14, 2006
    The red flags are all there. A constantly changing story from his camp as to why he doesn't want to be drug tested, then an outright refusal to be randomly tested, etc..
     
  10. Marnoff

    Marnoff Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,227
    27
    Feb 14, 2006
    How do you get evidence when he won't agree to be properly drug tested?
     
  11. Marnoff

    Marnoff Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,227
    27
    Feb 14, 2006
    How is it a "no-win" situation? All he had to do was take the tests, go knock Floyd Mayweather out, and collect an eight-figure payday. Sounds like a winning combination. Umm, unless he couldn't pass the tests.
     
  12. renyo

    renyo Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,417
    332
    Jul 21, 2007
    No...But I firmly believe the man who initiated these attacks smokes crack...And alot of it, I'd say by the looks of things at least one of his brothers do too. Probably a genetic flaw and they're compensating for brain malfunction somewhere.
     
  13. Marnoff

    Marnoff Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,227
    27
    Feb 14, 2006
    1. No, more likely because Pacquiao refused to be randomly tested, which is the only way for it to even be worthwhile.

    2. Under ineffective methods.
     
  14. Marnoff

    Marnoff Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,227
    27
    Feb 14, 2006
    Yep, it really begs the question when someone says on one hand that they really don't know what they are taking, then on the other hand knows that they are clean. How could both be true?

    Either he knows what he's taking and knows it's legal (or illegal) or doesn't know what he's taking and has no idea whether he's used performance enhancers.
     
  15. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member Full Member

    79,438
    2,646
    Feb 1, 2007
    He believes that he is clean. If you trust the people around you, even if you don't know what you're taking you can say that you're clean because you have people that you trust who do know.

    when I go eat at a restaurant, I don't know if the chef is putting drugs in my food or not. That won't stop me from saying that I know I'm clean. Even though i don't know the chef I trust him enough to say that he is not putting drugs in my food.