Jones, Toney, Hopkins, Calzaghe - ATG list

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Stinky gloves, Jun 18, 2007.


  1. bailey

    bailey Loyal Member Full Member

    39,816
    2,958
    Dec 11, 2009
    I had to note my quote in purple. Previous note, please see.
    In answer to your question I could say does Hopkins?
    When Hopkins has fought a good fighter his own size (except for Tarver who had been beaten 3 times already) he lost ie Jones, Taylor twice and Calzaghe. His big name wins are aganst naturally smaller fighters. Dont gat me wrong I think hes a good fighter and HOF fighter but just trying to take all in account
     
  2. ed7890

    ed7890 Col. Hunter Gathers Full Member

    8,170
    0
    Apr 4, 2009
    Did Calzaghe face a naturally smaller fighter when he fought Hopkins?

    Hopkins was Middleweight champ, Calzaghe fought his whole career at Supermiddle or above.

    I agree with you though that theres not much between them. I would give Hopkins the nod, but I agree with some of what your saying.

    And fair play to giving credit to Toney :good
     
  3. Mind Reader

    Mind Reader J-U-ICE Full Member

    16,769
    31
    Oct 26, 2006

    You are a complete moron... A Rico wannabe.... Wow, ESB is truly getting sad when idiots think it is cool to act like Rico.

    Not only your bull**** hatred for Roy Jones makes you a moron, but that whole post was littered with contradictions.... You really need to stop posting.

    You honestly think Calzaghe is more of an ATG than Jones Hopkins and Toney????:lol:

    And Jones was at the very bottom of your list, even though he holds 2 decisive victories over a near Prime Hopkins, and Prime Toney.. (two other people on the list)

    You criticize Jones for fighting garbage men, but have Calzaghe at the top of the list even though he BY FAR fought the lower level of opposition.:lol::lol::lol:

    Like I said, Moron.:deal
     
  4. NoCoolFool?

    NoCoolFool? Active Member Full Member

    833
    2
    Apr 1, 2006
    Jones - Superman in his prime. He was the man to beat. Moved to heavy and grabbed a minor title. Effective from middleweight to (limited) heavy. Risk-adverse attitude hurts his career - failed to rematch Hopkins but no fault of his. Failed to fight DM, but DM at fauly. Failed to fight Eubanks & Benn and a few others. But still a great resume.

    Toney - Most skilled. Fought from 160 to fat heavy. Fought and won to boxers which all other 3 would lose to as well. But he was the only one to really push himself. Hurt by inconsistancy and poor discipline. Most active of the four.

    Hopkins - Was at the top of his game longer than others. dominant at middle for MANY years - nothing wrong with that but hurts in P4P ratings by not moving up in weight compared to Jones and especially, Toney. Needed quality opposition to be exciting. Boring style to the casual fan. Hurt by lacklustre and poor opposition at middle. Awesome technician...but low output later in career. Great discipline.
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    Calzaghe - does not belong here. Greatly skilled and incredible level of fitness, output, and adaptability. Happy to wallow in obscurity for 80% of his career placing himself in the p4p neighbourhood of a Brian Neilson until he finally stepped up. Undefeated record but least active of the four. Beat a still dangerous but older Hopkins. Good retirement time places himself higher in many eyes. Great career from a managerial standpoint.
     
  5. Mind Reader

    Mind Reader J-U-ICE Full Member

    16,769
    31
    Oct 26, 2006

    Good Post:good

    I would probably swap Hopkins with Toney, but I agree with what you are saying.
     
  6. magnificentdave

    magnificentdave Constant Reminder Full Member

    1,788
    1
    Sep 14, 2006
    When you make that statement you also have to answer the question: Would Calzaghe ever have been able to make 160 or 155 pounds like Hopkins?
     
  7. ripcity

    ripcity Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,449
    51
    Dec 5, 2006
    Head to head Prime vs Prime
    1. Jones
    2. Toney
    3. Hopkins
    4. Calzaghie

    Career acomplishments. (championships quility of wins)
    1. Jones
    2. Toney
    3. Hopkins
    4. Calzaghie

    Talent/Skills
    1. Jones
    2. Toney
    3. Hopkins
    4. Calzaghe

    Overall
    1. Jones
    2. Toney
    3. Hopkins
    4. Calzaghe
     
  8. OBCboxer

    OBCboxer Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,948
    217
    Jun 2, 2007
    1. Jones

    His dominance is almost unmatched throughout history. He won titles in four weight classes and was the first Middleweight more than 100 years to win the HW title. He holds wins over Hopkins and Toney both of which are involved here. H2H he is one of the best fighters p4p as arguably nobody beats him at 160 and 168. He matches up pretty well in the LHW as only a handful (if that) beat him at this weight. His losses against Tarver, Johnson, Calzaghe and Green should not affect his legacy too much as he was past his best days in these fights.


    2. Bernard Hopkins

    His Middlweight reign puts him in the Middleweight pantheon with Monzon, Hagler and others. He took on all comers at 160 and unified the titles with a smaller but formidable and 40-0 Felix Trinidad. Jermain Taylor ended his Middlweight reign with two controversial victories. Hopkins then moved up and dominated Tarver while being the heavy underdog. His loss against Jones affects him a bit but still he keeps a high rating here. His loss against Joe Calzaghe isn't enough to drop him lower than Joe or Toney, he was 44 there and wasn't the same monster he was against Trinidad.

    3. Toney

    His longevity in 83 fights is underrated when James Toney comes up when rating him. He was the second fighter in 100 years after Jones to win the HW title but was later caught for steroids which stripped him of the title. He won the MW title from the highly skilled Michael Nunn who was 36-0. He had a decent reign but stole a victory away from Dave Tiberi in which he performed poorly. He moved up to Super Middle and holds wins over McCallum, Barkley and Littles. He was dominated by Jones over 12 and was nearly shut out in that fight. He moved up to light heavy and proceeded poor performances against Griffin and Thadzi. He resurged his career by making a good CW run and beating Vassily Jirov despite being the underdog. He moved up to HW and built himself a solid resume despite being greatly undersized.

    4. Calzaghe

    Being undefeated means something even if someone fights stiffs his whole career says Larry Holmes. I agree with this statement and think that Calzaghe had an OK resume. He won the title from an old Eubank but still a solid win for a young fighter like Calzaghe. He is the greatest of all time at 168 based on accomplishments but not H2H as I rate him below Jones in that department. He holds solid wins over Reid, Sheika, Woodhall, Lacy, Sika and Kessler at 168. He moved up to beat the still formidable but old Bernard Hopkins. To cap off his career he beat the shell of Roy Jones Jr. in a meaningless fight that was 10 years too late.
     
  9. MrPR

    MrPR Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,193
    24
    Mar 23, 2009
    1.Bernard "The Excutioner" Hopkins
    2.Roy Jones Jr
    3.James "Lights Out" Toney
     
  10. box101

    box101 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,088
    1
    Dec 19, 2009
    so no one is going to give james credit for beating doug dewitt,reggie johnson,prince charles willams all world champs plus then undefeated merqui sosa,an tim littles solid contenders to go along with other champs listed on resume.1a toney 1b jones 3 hopkins 4 joe
     
  11. Brutalwayz

    Brutalwayz Active Member Full Member

    1,178
    2
    Feb 12, 2010
    ding ding ding!!! We have a winner!!!:d
     
  12. 46and0

    46and0 It's irrefutable. Full Member

    7,007
    130
    Dec 6, 2008
    A Rico wannabe? Why, because I too know a Glass Jawed joke when I see one? Or is it the Glass Jaw avatars, which incidentally I created.:patsch

    I can't believe you rate a steroid-injecting, fat illiterate pea-brained idiot such as James Toney ahead of Joe Calzaghe. That shows your clear bias. You are a complete and utter Roy Jones fanboy nuthugger. It's enough to make one want to vomit.:barf:rofl:lol:

    And you say that Jones' opponents were better than Calzaghe's. How so? Calzaghe fought full-time boxers. Jones fought part-time boxing hobbyists who worked the firestations and sanitation plants of Backwater, Idaho or Bum****, Tennessee. :lol::lol::lol:
     
  13. darryl1914

    darryl1914 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,243
    2
    Jun 14, 2009
    Well F***ING Said!!!!!:good
     
  14. des3995

    des3995 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,903
    126
    Oct 23, 2009
    LOL..... ya got me.
     
  15. des3995

    des3995 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,903
    126
    Oct 23, 2009
    Reluctantly, I concur.