Now that the dust has settled and floyd is facing the tougher comp......

Dude, what was your point of typing all of this?:huh You seem to overlook what my whole arguement was! No offense that means nothing to me, I simply called Only the truth out on his bull**** and you come to me with this...What does that have to do with what I've been trying to discuss?

 

I hate to break it to you haters but the overwhelming majority still voted that Pac is clean and that % will only go up as time goes on and this little rumour dies down.

 

What? No man! As great trainers the Mayweather's are, they can talk alot of nonsense sometimes especially before a fight. If what Sr. said of Pac really is true or not, one thing is for sure. He saw something in Pac that he did not feel comfortable Floyd fighting Pac.

 

No, he agreed to test, just not every test Floyd wanted.

 

No, they aren't fine. But there are much better and professional ways to go about it then baseless accusations.

 

He agreed to test as long as he had a huge window in which it was possible to cycle in, which meant the test he was proposing was pointless.

 

What was he going to cycle in that window?

absolutely nothing.

 

a good way to find out if pac was really juicing or not is if the commissions demand an immediate blood test 14 days before his fight with clottey. It will caught him and his team off guard and we'll find out whether he was really juicing or not

 

You sound just like Barry Bonds right where there was only rumors that he may be juicing......

Bonds back then would answer a question with a question......Bonds would state, "Steroids is'nt going to make me put the bat on the ball!"
....that was Bonds reasoning behind not wanting to answer steroid questions


You sound just as silly PH|LLA, of course Pacquiao is'nt going to cycle anything if the tests are done thoroughly and properly without a window to cycle them in!dealyep

 

This thread is loaded. This is your opinion and you are entitled to it, but, styles make fights. Mosley is going to look just like Baldomir in this fight against Floyd...this isn't a tough opponent for Floyd. With that said, Floyd deserves a lot of credit for finally fighting a top rated and natural welterweight. But, Clottey vs Mosley would be a much more entertaining fight than anyone versus Floyd. Mayweather, a lot like Toney and Hopkins, are very skilled but God awful to watch.

Maybe it's just me, but I like to see fighting in fights.

Pac deserves just as much credit as Floyd for fighting a very avoided and tough welterweight. If anyone can't see that, they have the Pac-hate lenses on.

 

I don't follow baseball.

Bottom line, first of all the accusations are baseless and second of all Pacquiao already agreed to more stringent testing than anyone else is subject to.

 

So you think 24 days is not a big enough window for a cycle of PED's?

 

Instead of answering my question with a question, answer it with an answer.

 

Without being a qualified pharmacist, I'll let the USADA answer this one for me.

Q: One other thing I wanted to touch base with you on -- when the Mayweather-Pacquiao discussions finally fell apart at the beginning of the month, [url]it came down to a 10-day differential[/url]; Mayweather bent to 'I'll agree to 14 days prior to the event when there will be no blood testing,' and Pacquiao wouldn't go later than 24 days. Even if Mayweather had yielded to 24 days, what can an athlete do in 24 days? I mean, if you're clean 24 days before the fight, what can you do in the next 24 days that would have any impact on the fight whatsoever?

A: "The human growth hormone for sure, levels of testosterone, and other designer steroids. Sounds like you've got some information -- I'm not agreeing factually that was the difference, and I'm not disagreeing. But if that's the case, the other piece is that, prior to that 14-day or 24-day blackout period, what system was in place? Were you just using the Nevada, or the state of California, system? If that's the case, I'm not worried about the 14-day or the 24-day blackout period, I'm worried about the rest of it. If someone's telling you that's where it fell apart, I think you've got to add the follow-up, 'Well, what kind of testing was going to happen before the 14-day or the 24-day blackout period?' The 14-day period, I'm a lot less concerned about that than what you're doing in the two months before that 14-day period."

...............

Now we've got that out of the way, perhaps you could answer my question.

So you think 24 days is not a big enough window for a cycle of PED's?