Let' consider Vlad and Vitali agianst the all-time HW greats more fairly...

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by NeckBreaknAiken, Mar 1, 2010.


  1. NeckBreaknAiken

    NeckBreaknAiken Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    21,014
    4
    Jul 30, 2008
    Every time I see a topic about Klits vs. the Greats, someone always brings up how much stronger athletes are today, etc. What they all fail to mention is that these odern heavyweights enjoy the benefit of bio-engineering at it's finest. So let's suppose Muhammad Ali, or George Foreman, or even Larry Holmes had a team of bio-engieers at their exposure, to assist them in the type of strength and stamina conditioning that these guys have now...



    What if one of these two scenarios occured:

    1) Klit Brothers boxed in the 1960's, 70's, 80's, or 90's where they would have had the same type of training that the respective champs in that era had..

    or

    2) All-time greats from the 60's, 70's, 80's and 90's had been exposed to the benefits of modern medicine, fitness, and nutrition...


    Would the Klit Brothers have been as dominant as they appear to be at this point? Even in a head-to-head historical sense?
     
  2. TheJuggernaut

    TheJuggernaut Hitchslap Full Member

    7,253
    105
    Sep 29, 2008
    Probably not.
    The Klits are the absolute epidome of modern fitness and nutrition, which is why they are so utterly dominate in todays division, and in my opinion would be just as dominate in other eras, if they enjoyed the benefits of 21th century fitness and nutrition. But if athletes like Ali had the same advances, they would be that much better, which would slightly even the playing field. (Maybe not Foreman, he simply wasnt that smart...).
    All things being equal, though, the Klits would still be very good because they have excellent work ethics, and they are very smart men in the ring.
     
  3. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล Full Member

    82,426
    1,465
    Sep 7, 2008
    Traning doesn't mean a huge amount.

    Put it this way; older fighters had smaller gloves. If Wlad had to fight regularly in say, the 20's, with his training methods against theirs, who thinks he'd be dominant? He'd get starched more often than not IMO.

    Vitali is good but couldn't beat the Lewis that lost to Rahman (unfocused, out of shape) dead in the middle of his prime.
     
  4. taobum70

    taobum70 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,852
    4
    Feb 9, 2010

    Wouldn't those smaller gloves also improve Wlad's power?? The current version of Wlad is difficult to hit and with 1930's gloves would have more devastating and earlier knockouts.
     
  5. TheJuggernaut

    TheJuggernaut Hitchslap Full Member

    7,253
    105
    Sep 29, 2008
    Great point. He would absolutely devistate someone like Marciano
     
  6. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล Full Member

    82,426
    1,465
    Sep 7, 2008
    They also make perfect punching form different. And in an era where rough housing is allowed how is he going to maintain range and land his bombs? I personally think he'd get slaughtered.

    Vitali would be better suited, but with his list of injuries how will his body hold up for 80+ pro fights?
     
  7. Boxed Ears

    Boxed Ears this my daddy's account (RIP daddy) Full Member

    56,070
    10,482
    Jul 28, 2009
    I think we both know, eliminating weight classes, Pavlik messes up both K brothers. And Ali. So, you know how I'm voting.
     
  8. NeckBreaknAiken

    NeckBreaknAiken Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    21,014
    4
    Jul 30, 2008
    Yes.. We both know it...

    :lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:
     
  9. tays001

    tays001 ESB ELITE SQUAD Full Member

    15,124
    7
    Mar 6, 2006
    alot of those fighter minus a few would be fighting at Cruiserweight. Imagine Ali at 230-235? yeah he'd be alot slower. and you can bring up the chris bird fight with Vitaly but we all know Bird was losing that fight. got the W though. as far as wlad. i t depends wich version. the younger wlad would have a harder time the recent one well he does fairly well
     
  10. Squire

    Squire Let's Go Champ Full Member

    9,120
    4
    Jun 22, 2009
    I think the Klitschko's would dominate pre 70s. Neither of them take many flush shots, and both hit so hard that smaller gloves would work in their favour. Even if they aren't p4p better than Marciano and Louis, the size difference is too much for them to overcome. Realistically we're talking about different weight classes here

    As for conditioning, don't forget they are from the former Soviet Union- so I think it woud be fair to say they'd still be better conditioned than their US counterparts.

    By the 70s though, its a lot harder to say how they'd do.
     
  11. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล Full Member

    82,426
    1,465
    Sep 7, 2008
    Yeah, because the size of Carnera was real hard for Louis to overcome:huh
     
  12. elTerrible

    elTerrible TeamElite General Manager Full Member

    11,392
    15
    May 24, 2006
    :lol: yeah because carnera was comparable to either klitschko in terms of skill
     
  13. Squire

    Squire Let's Go Champ Full Member

    9,120
    4
    Jun 22, 2009
    Yea and Louis would beat Valuev and Jameel McCline aswell. Doesn't mean he would beat a Klitschko
     
  14. KERRIGAN

    KERRIGAN Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,714
    2
    Dec 21, 2009
    The Klit's have co-ordination that Carnera could only dream of having.

    I still think Ali beats the Klits, as would Holmes, Louis, Frazier and Holyfield.

    The reach and height of the Klits, might be too much for Marciano and Dempsey though, but who knows.
     
  15. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล Full Member

    82,426
    1,465
    Sep 7, 2008
    As always, Carnera getting underrated.

    Watch some of his fights. The Klits are champs now because of the numerous title belts and poor division.

    In an era with one title, how would the Klits dominate? How would they handle regular fights? Smaller goves?

    End of :good