Why do people contribute to a thread that they don't rate/agree with/ think is factually incorrect, over and above of " i disagree ". Fleaman, you appear to have a good knowledge but seem intent on digging people out who you think don't know as much as you or don't agree with you. It is as if you have little man syndrome, grow up mate you may have read plenty of books and mags etc but that doesn't give you the definitive view or the right to try and belittle people because of their opinions. I don't particularly agree with what the thread starter has suggested but can see where he is coming from, no need to abuse him like a bully in the schoolyard.
Fair enough. Nice avatar :good I also provided video analysis. He's also the guy who makes '****' jokes. It was all in good fun however, I wasn't being outwardly rude to him IMO. Questioned his knowledge but so what? It's all in good fun wheny ou post a thread saying Marciano had 'little skill' (or whatever terminology he originally used) and I felt the need to show him that wasn't the case. That's called argument. Not quite sure what you're getting at. I do point the finger at times but only when pointless threads are posted:good
First and foremost you just wrote something like 'Tyson would smash him in a round' Then I responded:good
Woah, woah, woah, lets get it straight; I ain't trying to have the last word. Just not letting you make me out to be some kind of ****:good
What is the name of the place called that Froch talks about been Warriors heaven...:think It begins with V...:think
I said he was "technically not that great". But Marciano's skill level wasn't even the question posed in this thread. I dont believe any thread is pointless as we all have valid opinions whether you agree with them or not. The fact you have kept on and on with this and added insult yourself (even before I did) does make you look a little ridiculous. Especially when you "felt the need" to post "video analysis". Dont force your opinion on people. Thats just plain wrong.
You obviously don't know how this forum works. You say something someone disagrees with, it gets challenged. What do you want, everyone to agree with you? I thought I was doing you a favour to be honest by showing you a facet of Marciano you nay not have been familiar with. Your sky sports thread WAS pointless: this one has beeninteresting :good I won't change the way I conduct myself: there are enough people on here that value my contributions and/or think I'm just in the way I behave. I'm sorry if I have offended anyone, but I will continue to respond to ignorant statements.
Valhalla...thats where Kessler will be living when Froch has finished with him. As an aside, I also think that Marciano is largely overrated