the Taylor abraham beat was no different than the one pavlik beat

Vs. Abraham Taylor lacked the zip he had against Pavlik. Plus he was barely catching AA with anything soild, but against Pav., he was holding his own through about round 5.

 

Do you personally know the thread starters parents?
If not, insulting them because he wrote something that doesn't make Pavlik out to be a demi god shows a total lack of class from you. Why don't you try growing up?

 

Fortunately for us, it is still impossible for your kind to breed.

 

Having watched both fights and remember what people said at the time, no one really thought he won, though a number did talk about thinking the second fight a draw. The first fight was not a miracle either. Taylor swung wildly a buzzed Pavlik while he was being cocky. Pavlik got up at the coutn of one and had Taylor clinching and trying not to get dropped by the end of that same round. Taylor faded late in that second fight, a common problem for him, and Pavlik took control. Taylor isn't much different now. He still fades late (he's done that since the first Hopkins fight). Froch and Abraham both bang and knew how to take advantage of Taylor's only real flaw. Taylor really isn't a done fighter, but he will need to learn to how to dominate or take out his opponent in that first half and then shell up those last two rounds to keep from seeing a tragic end over and over. :think

 

Nothing you say can be taken serious...especially after saying BRONCO ****ING MCKART would have beaten pavlik of the hopkins fight.

Log off and call it a night senile :hi:

 

But you can't really teach a fighter to have great defense at the end of their career if they're not accustomed to it. Besides that I agree with everything else:happy

 

this.

 

wow pavlik destroyed taylor wore him down and beat him up aa was beating him but only kod him with a lucky punch

 

:think

atsch

 

You must be booradley's kin.