If Chambers knocks Wlad out?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Punisher33, Mar 6, 2010.


  1. Punisher33

    Punisher33 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,407
    8
    Oct 8, 2007
    I personally can't see this happening, but anythings possible with Wlad's glass chin. My question is if Chambers knocks Wlad out, would it be a bigger shocker/upset to you than when Brewster did it back in April of 04?
     
  2. JC2006

    JC2006 Active Member Full Member

    1,336
    0
    Dec 3, 2005
  3. DamonD

    DamonD Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,285
    40
    Nov 19, 2004
    Definitely, Brewster was regarded as a good hitter despite the rest of his flaws.

    Chambers really isn't the big punching type. I mean, it could be a breakdown or corner stoppage, that'd be one thing, but a straight KO?

    That would be a massive surprise to me.
     
  4. Medicine

    Medicine Boxing Addict banned

    4,277
    4
    Dec 6, 2008
    Wlad is a way better fighter now then he was at the time of the first brewster fight.
     
  5. Punisher33

    Punisher33 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,407
    8
    Oct 8, 2007
    All around? Yes. Offensively? No. He used to have a much higher output of punches and was probably a little more powerful, because at that time he didn't paw with his jab. He put his weight behind his punches. Now he paces himself and is usually extra cautious in most fights. The Brewster fight made him even more aware of his obvious flaws.
     
  6. Medicine

    Medicine Boxing Addict banned

    4,277
    4
    Dec 6, 2008
    Yea but with the better defense a KO is less likely. So if an average puncher like Chambers can get through his D a put him down for the count then I would consider that much more of an accomplishment then Brewster who is a heavy puncher putting a less defensive Wlad down.
     
  7. lefthook89

    lefthook89 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,569
    82
    Sep 28, 2009
    RUSKULL would commit suicide:deal
     
  8. Punisher33

    Punisher33 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,407
    8
    Oct 8, 2007
    Well I agree with you, though many believe a great offensive (Which is something Wlad once had), is sometimes ones best defensive. You must remember, Wlad was a pro for 7 years and never really had his chin or toughness tested until the Sanders fight in 03. So up until that point, Wlad's offensive was a great enough shield to protect him from his glass chin and lack of toughness from being exposed to his oppenents. Now that it's out in the open, Wlad stays clear of having any exchanges with his oppenents. So instead of firing back, he looks to clinch instead.
     
  9. KCD

    KCD All aboard. Full Member

    8,219
    2
    Sep 30, 2007
    Chambers would be the bigger upset as he is not regarded as a puncher, but i actually think Chambers is a better fighter than Brewster.
     
  10. Punisher33

    Punisher33 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,407
    8
    Oct 8, 2007
    :lol: Knowing him, he probably would. He's this boards biggest Wlad supporter I believe.
     
  11. Rock0052

    Rock0052 Loyal Member Full Member

    34,221
    5,875
    Apr 30, 2006
    Absolutely. Wlad's a tougher fighter to beat than he was 6 years ago, and Chambers doesn't have near the 1 punch pop that Brewster did. Him knocking out Klitschko would be one of the biggest upset performances in the last 20 years because we're talking about a contender who hasn't knocked out a single one of his best opponents to date.
     
  12. Punisher33

    Punisher33 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,407
    8
    Oct 8, 2007
    Maybe at Heavyweight, though Sanders knocking out Wlad should be up there. Considering Sanders never knocked out anyone of substance up until that point. Lewis getting laid out by Rahman comes to mind.

    While Brewster was an obviously better puncher, his skillset is not on Chambers level. As a huge Brewster fan I could honeslty say, the only reasons I liked Brewster so much was for his never say die attitude. The fact that he lost to journeymen like Shufford and Eitenne, not to mention having life and death matches with Meehan and Krasniqi just exposes how beatable he was throughout his career.

    I think Chambers is the better boxer, but that wont be enough to beat Wlad at this point in his career.
     
  13. Rock0052

    Rock0052 Loyal Member Full Member

    34,221
    5,875
    Apr 30, 2006
    The other thing to remember is that Brewster was an absolute shark when he smelled blood...I rate Chambers' all around skills higher than LB's, but that's an aspect I've yet to see from Eddie.

    As it stands, I just don't think Chambers hits hard enough to short circuit Wlad's gameplan and make it anything more than business as usual for Klitschko. He deserves the shot, I simply wouldn't bet on him coming through with the titles after it. Still mad no US network picked the fight up, though.
     
  14. Punisher33

    Punisher33 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,407
    8
    Oct 8, 2007
    Absolutely, thats how he got the nickname "Relentless". Chambers jab is extremely quick, it's like Bryds, but with some ass behind it. Brewster just had the hook in his arsenal, and at times during his career he found himself very off-balance with it, which helped guys like Lyakhovich and Maheen be able to counter him a good bit.

    I too don't believe Chambers can short circuit Wlad's jab and grab gameplan. The only thing I want to point out is, Brewster shouldn't of even been in the ring with Wlad that night. Though Don King some how got him a top 10 WBO ranking with out fighting anyone of substance and being out of action for 15 months before facing Wlad. At least Chambers fought his way to the top and is a true top 5 oppenent.
     
  15. ironchamp

    ironchamp Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,365
    1,033
    Sep 5, 2004
    I think it would be about the same. Remember Brewster was supposed to be a small step up after Fabian Moli and Nicholson. I don't think anyone thought that Brewster had a chance despite Wladimir's shattered aura at that time. He seemed vunerable and Lamon was supposed to be a great confidence booster. And Brewster pulled the upset.

    Now fast-forward in time, Wlad is an established champ. Regarded as the best HW in the world. This time Chambers is challenging for his title based on his merit. So while Chambers is a better opponent than Lamon, I think that if he upset him it would be about the same.