Mayweather can't say he is the best

i have no problem with your take but it has holes....you hang floyd if he doesnt fight Mosley but still hang him cus he "was backed in the corner" as you say....so if he wins...then both these arguments mean what?

All the while propel Pac but his last fights were a severely dehydrated ODLH, Made the WW champ fight at his non champion wieght, a 140 great fight and David Diaz....and blatanly just down right saying NO to Mosley...but PAC is praised???? How is this?

 

I'm sorry. I think that there is too much logic and reason in this post for a ******* to comprehend. No matter what evidence you present, no matter how strong your argument, these clowns are never going to give Mayweather his due.

 

reread my post, I never praised Pac. I said the Pac fight fell through (for whatever reason) and then I said that "many people blame him(Mayweather) for the Pac fight falling through"

And yes I will agree with you that Mayweather was/is kind of in a dammed if you do dammed if you don't situation. I think he chose the one that will make him the most $, fighting Shane.

 

i have read response about peoples take on floyd fight mosely, but yet know one has answered the question of " whats your take on pac not fighting mosely" that question was dodged just as good as pac dodge mosley

So I am still waiting to see the answer to that....please dont use clottey as an excuse because the person who asked that question was talking about when ssm used to go to the gym and beg pac...it was around that time when roch did that interview saying that he wouldnt fight ssm cause he was better than oscar

 

You tell me....why didnt he take the fight?:think there was no reason not to...especially seing as how PAC fights the best right? A warrior? Peoples champ? If Floyd is more dangerous why not avoid him and fight Mosley? Apparently the easier of the two from what your saying.

Keep in mind Mosley is the #1 WW..why avoid that challenge for NO OBVIOUS reason...but peopls shyt on Floyd who at least has tried to entertain a fight with Mosley years back and now fighting him when Mosley is still #1 WW.

All im saying is WHY....what reasons other than he is not all that different in path choosing than Mayweather?

 

Okay... who should Mayweather have fought? Margacheato? He tried to fight Cotto but Arum wouldn't have it. He tried to fight Pacquiao but Pacquiao ran off to fight Clottey. Now he's fighting Shane Mosley, former P4P King. Who is the best that he has not fought or has not tried to fight?

Pacquiao has some good names on his resume, however when you consider Pac's resume at 145...I mean 147 is lackluster when you consider the circumstances at which he fought. Factor in that he ducked Mosley and Mayweather and Pacquiao's legacy starts to lose it's luster.

:deal

 

He can say he's the best @ 147 if he beats Mosley and goes on to beat Pac assuming Pac beats Clottey and Pac/May gets scheduled and there's nothing to hold them back from fighting each other.

 

he's the best.... P4P DUCKER if thats what you mean.
But no, hes not the best. I can see multiple welter weights DECIMATING floyd.
Sugar Ray Leonard
Sugar Ray Robinson
Pernelll Whitaker
Thomas Hearns
Marvin Hagler
Roy Jones Jr
These guys would smash him. sure hes undefeated but soon Mosley will destroy him.