Sam Langford vs. Max Schmeling

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by dpw417, Mar 7, 2010.


  1. dpw417

    dpw417 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,461
    345
    Jul 13, 2007
    15 rounds. Heavyweights. Would Max be the most accurate right hand puncher that Langford ever faced?... Would it matter?
     
  2. jaffay

    jaffay New Orleans Hornets Full Member

    3,980
    16
    Jun 24, 2007
    Schmeling handed beating to a welter/middleweight Mickey Walker so I think that he could handle Sam Langford. But from the other hand Langford hits harder than Walker and Schmeling doesn't have granite chin. Interesting matchup but I'll go with Schmeling UD
     
  3. SLAKKA

    SLAKKA Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,829
    23
    Jun 4, 2009
    If you asked Jack Blackburn about Maxs chases vs Thammy he'd wet his trousers laughing yer ase down!!
     
  4. bodhi

    bodhi Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,229
    257
    Oct 22, 2009
    I think Schmeling with his methodical approach has a good chance of breaking Langford down and knocking him out. Of course Sam is no pushover and has also the chance to KO Schmeling. Stylewise Schmeling has the right one to weather Langford's storm and counter him with his rights. Pretty even fight. I slightly favour Max but this may very well be due to me hero-worshiping him.
     
  5. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    260
    Jul 22, 2004
    Without seeing Langford its hard to judge, he seems to punch a little wide and not so straight and be somewhat of a face first brawler. Schmelling is probably faster with straighter punches, greater countering, hes naturally bigger and rangier. Schmelling was a great puncher but Langford was only really getting stopped past his prime despite fighting the big HWs

    Hesitantly Schmelling UD
     
  6. djanders

    djanders Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,065
    6,876
    Feb 21, 2009
    In their primes I'm going with Langford in this one. It wouldn't be an easy fight for either of them, in my opinion.
     
  7. SLAKKA

    SLAKKA Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,829
    23
    Jun 4, 2009
    The ghosts of Jack Blackburn and Joe Woodman are giving you guys the horse laugh!
     
  8. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,556
    Nov 24, 2005
    I doubt it. I think they know Schmeling was a great fighter.

    Schmeling beat a prime Joe Louis. I'd give him a good chance to beat Langford.
     
  9. SLAKKA

    SLAKKA Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,829
    23
    Jun 4, 2009
    Right Blackburn said Max was a great fighter...right!!

    U wanna put some $$ on that please?
     
  10. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,556
    Nov 24, 2005
    No. I didn't say that.

    You're talking about ghosts. I'm saying those ghosts (if they existed) would probably know Schmeling was a great fighter. But since I dont believe in ghosts it's certainly not something I feel strongly about, nevermind bet on.

    Anyway, I missed your point obviously. Are Blackburn's views particularly relevant ?
     
  11. djanders

    djanders Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,065
    6,876
    Feb 21, 2009
    Hey! Wait just a minute there! I take exception to that remark! I know for a fact that Woodman's laugh sounded more like a goat than a horse! :p

    “Don’t nobody need to feel sorry for old Sam. I had plenty of good times. I been all over the world. I fought maybe 600 fights, and every one was a pleasure!” -Sam Langford, 1955.
     
  12. SLAKKA

    SLAKKA Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,829
    23
    Jun 4, 2009
    uforfiven bubbala

    blackbun had no feelins on max being great fighter whatsoever!

    joe louis in 36 was far from prime, that a ridiculous comment.

    You asked y blackburns relevent??
    Well because he always mentioned Sam as the greatest fighter of them all
    his opinion on this match is about as relevant a voice as humanity has to offer!
     
  13. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,248
    26,573
    Feb 15, 2006
    Langford would win.

    Schmeling could give him some problems with that overhand right, but Langford was just as sneaky with his punches and had more layers to his game. I see both fighters landing some good counters, while Langfords body attack wears Schmeling down, figures him out, and sets him up for the finish.
     
  14. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    50,386
    23,501
    Jan 3, 2007
    I have never seen Sam Langford fight, but his reputation is enough to be favored over Ali, Holmes, Tyson, Louis, Lewis, Frazier, Marciano and Dempsey... No film needed here.. He was a 5'7", 180 lb monster who fought like a rampaging beast, leaving no living thing standing in his wake.. He out generaled generals. Drank rivers and ate mountains.. He had 34 career losses and some 40 draws, but all of them can be well justified, because he was fighting sometimes as many as 8 or 9 elite fighters per week..Its futile to compare anyone to Langford.
     
    Journeyman92 likes this.
  15. SLAKKA

    SLAKKA Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,829
    23
    Jun 4, 2009
    sanity has arrived in this thred