Bradley: "I Don't Want To See Pacquiao vs. Clottey - It's A Joke"

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by san rafael, Mar 9, 2010.


  1. el mosquito

    el mosquito Boxing Addict banned

    5,805
    0
    Nov 20, 2009
    ****en LOL hahahaha. Bradley would get beat hard by Joshua Clottey. If Pac-Clottey is a joke, then Pac-Bradley would be a ****en BAD joke lol :lol:
     
  2. whoupicking?

    whoupicking? Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,378
    2
    Mar 4, 2010
    He already made an impact by beating cotto. Now there is the possible talk of pac facing valero, no way does valero deserve a shot before bradley.
     
  3. Ringnut

    Ringnut Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,009
    2
    May 1, 2009
    honestly I would have preferred Pac-Bradley, let Pac really establish his dominance at 140. But I think we all know this fight had almost no chance of being made at the time. Greedy Arum would obviously want to keep all the money to himself if he could.
     
  4. whoupicking?

    whoupicking? Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,378
    2
    Mar 4, 2010
    Pac v bradley would actually be a good fight at 140. A fight a lot of people would like to see.
     
  5. theunderdog

    theunderdog Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,814
    1
    Jul 4, 2006
    molsey was scheduled to fight berto and mayweahter was the fighter he didn want to fight. clottey was the next highest ranked welter out there.
     
  6. GrCh

    GrCh Active Member Full Member

    618
    0
    May 25, 2009
    Maybe I'm not giving Bradley enough credit, but I think Pac steamrolls through him with much greater ease then his upcoming fight with Clottey. We'll see saturday though
     
  7. 8count

    8count sidekick Full Member

    1,788
    0
    Jun 5, 2009
    i'd like to see Valero-Bradley. Both could show their claim to stardom, regardless of who wins.... as long as they perform, of course.
     
  8. theunderdog

    theunderdog Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,814
    1
    Jul 4, 2006
    it was at 145. i personally think it did not make a difference but i think pac needed/wanted to beat a legitimate welterweight so he can have some sort of bargaining power should the negotiations with mayweather restart. and again beating a welter seems like a better bargaining chip than beating the best light welter.

    we should talk about valero when we get there. though i agree that bradley deserves the shot more than valero, nothing's really scheduled so we shouldn't bother talking about it now.
     
  9. san rafael

    san rafael 0.00% lemming Full Member

    27,684
    7
    Jun 11, 2008
    Interesting.
     
  10. el mosquito

    el mosquito Boxing Addict banned

    5,805
    0
    Nov 20, 2009
    yes it is a good fight. But a Pac-clottey is a better fight because Clottey presents bigger challenge to Pac. To say that Pac-Clottey is a joke is to say that Pac-Bradley is a **** of a fight lol
     
  11. GrCh

    GrCh Active Member Full Member

    618
    0
    May 25, 2009
    I remember hearing something like that as well.. Probably more of the same 'the money isn't right' bull**** that's getting incredibly old.
     
  12. Bernard James

    Bernard James Member Full Member

    374
    0
    Mar 5, 2010
    "Miguel Cotto beat Clottey, and Pacquiao crushed Cotto. So what do you think Pacquioa will do to Clottey?""

    who is this Bradley guy? Calling Pac/Clottey a joke?

    who ever he is, he obviously doesn't know Boxing because many experts here schooled me when I said Floyd is fighting Mosely, a guy Cotto beat who Pacquiao destroyed.
    Maybe one of the experts can tell Bradley that styles make fights because he's obviously a noob.
     
  13. el mosquito

    el mosquito Boxing Addict banned

    5,805
    0
    Nov 20, 2009
    he probably hasn't been to a gym before and doesn't know what a glove feels like lol
     
  14. Trixie

    Trixie Active Member Full Member

    1,356
    0
    Oct 11, 2009
    Not technically, but Mayweather was obviously out and Mosley was tied up with Berto
     
  15. whoupicking?

    whoupicking? Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,378
    2
    Mar 4, 2010
    I agree but the way he said it was as if they were already tied up which they weren't, only mosley was tied up at the time with berto.

    But i now understand what he meant.