Hector Camacho Sr: Top 5 ATG at 135/140?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Son of Gaul, Mar 11, 2010.


  1. Son of Gaul

    Son of Gaul Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,628
    30
    Feb 16, 2010
    Pretty mature there for someone who knows so much.
     
  2. Son of Gaul

    Son of Gaul Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,628
    30
    Feb 16, 2010
    Oh wait maybe you prefer communicating like this...:scaredas::yep:hey:tired:bart:-(:)dead:smooch:nono

    LOL
     
  3. Mr Butt

    Mr Butt Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,678
    183
    May 16, 2009

    sorry son of gaul but i don't see him being competitive against pryor or Armstrong at 135 the pressure combined with power would see a similar fight to that of the chavez fight at 140lbs. these two are the only two i a sure would stop him

    berg would be a tough fight for both but i personally see berg also swarming him but berg and whitaker are the two lightest puchers on my short list and would of course not have the power of the other fighters mentioned

    whitaker of course would not swarm camacho but i think would out point him in a at times dull fight


    canzoneri i think to be all round to skilled for camacho and may even stop him late i do not think lightly of camacho ,he was a very skilled fast operator

    ross would be a very good fight but i think ross had a better left than camcho and better power.

    also i am looking at these fights to be 15 round contest's

    of course you may well disagree which is all good youre opinions are as good as anyone else's :good
     
  4. bladerunner

    bladerunner El Intocable Full Member

    33,921
    133
    Jul 20, 2004
    Dont tell me you're a former world champ like Nallege.

    how can anyone argue with someone who thinks camacho is top five at 135 and 140 cause he had fast hands and a good chin,it just cant be done.
     
  5. Son of Gaul

    Son of Gaul Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,628
    30
    Feb 16, 2010
    Instead of just doing what you're doing, why don't you pretend like this is a forum and give some counterarguments like the gentleman above. I'm open to discussion on this, that's obviously why I started the thread. :-(
     
  6. Son of Gaul

    Son of Gaul Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,628
    30
    Feb 16, 2010
    Hey man, great points. That's all I wanted when I started the thread. A healthy, respectful debate. Thank you so much for participating. :good
     
  7. Henke67

    Henke67 One of the 45% Full Member

    9,468
    376
    Feb 10, 2009
    Camacho was great at 130 but doesn't even belong in a discussion about the great Lightweights. 140 is a relatively new division but he certainly wouldn't feature in a top 5 there either.
     
  8. Son of Gaul

    Son of Gaul Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,628
    30
    Feb 16, 2010
    Valid points but am I the only guy who watched him in the mid 80's?
    In any case, thanks for contributing.:good
     
  9. Henke67

    Henke67 One of the 45% Full Member

    9,468
    376
    Feb 10, 2009
    I very much enjoyed watching him at 130 - lightning-fast hands, good power and good skills.

    Even though he kept his hand-speed, I don't think he was ever as impressive at 135 and upwards. He just never did enough at those weights to convince me he could live with the best fighters who've fought in those divisions.

    It is a little unfortunate that his best days are largely forgotten and he seems to be best remembered for his losses though.
     
  10. Son of Gaul

    Son of Gaul Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,628
    30
    Feb 16, 2010
    Yes, exactly my point. His clownish behavior doesn't help any but he seems to be forever remembered for his one-sided losses to JCC and DLH(past his prime).
     
  11. Son of Gaul

    Son of Gaul Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,628
    30
    Feb 16, 2010
    In my mind, his greatest performances were against Ramirez, Rosario and Edwards...all at LW.
     
  12. Son of Gaul

    Son of Gaul Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,628
    30
    Feb 16, 2010
    It seems like the thread has changed from 'Does Hector Camacho get enough respect?' to 'When was his prime?' but it's cool. A healthy debate is always welcome. I still believe all of his best wins were at LW.:yep
     
  13. victor879

    victor879 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,017
    42
    Dec 1, 2007

    ^^^ This. If you were saying 130 pounds, I might agree he is around top 5, but probably more like top 10-15. I would have to really look at the list of fighters from that weight class to make a real decision though. However, nobody will deny that Camacho was great at 130 pounds.

    Up above those weights at 135 and 140 though? I don't think so, not top 5 anyways.


    Although I agree with the other posters here Bladerunner: You should lighten up, seriously. If the guy does not know, educate him. Don't need to be a douche bag about it like he stole your lunch money.
     
  14. Son of Gaul

    Son of Gaul Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,628
    30
    Feb 16, 2010
    LOL, I'm not worried about him and I do know what I'm talking about. I still contend that his prime was at 135 as he lost none of his hand speed/reflexes and all of his greatest wins were at that weight (Ramirez, Rosario, Edwards).
     
  15. Son of Gaul

    Son of Gaul Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,628
    30
    Feb 16, 2010
    I don't really need the back-up but thanks anyway and , as always, thanks for contributing. Just watch the film and tell me that any of his wins at 130 are better than his performances against( Ramirez, Rosario and Edwards).