Let's go Modern - who was the best fighter in each of the 9 modern divisions?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by horst, Mar 13, 2010.


  1. teeto

    teeto Obsessed with Boxing banned

    28,075
    54
    Oct 15, 2007
    I've commented on it a few times Popkins, in the general also. I'll find my post now, but first i just want to say that while i may very well ultimately favour Jones, Calzaghe has more body of work there. What's the criteria here?
     
  2. manbearpig

    manbearpig A Scottish Noob Full Member

    3,255
    134
    Feb 6, 2009
    How many fights did Jones have at 168 again?
    Calzaghe is the clear best at the weight.
     
  3. cuchulain

    cuchulain Loyal Member Full Member

    36,586
    11,624
    Jan 6, 2007

    Obviously.

    I believe I made my caveats in the original post.

    I thought you mentioned earlier that you were only considering H to H.

    If so, record of achievement would be less important than hypothetical face-to-face matchup.

    IMO, Leonard at 154 in 1981 would definitely be a realistic contender at 154.

    In Mayweather's case, again, I am using your criteria.

    How do I feel they would stack up h to h ?

    If you change the criteria, then Calzaghe moves ahead of Jones based on what he actually DID at 168, despite us agreeing that Roy would be the clear favourite, H2H.



    (Almost forgot. I would perhaps consider Hatton very slightly better than Gatti, perhaps not. He certainly wasn't CONSIDERABLY better, especially the version that faced Pac.)
     
  4. horst

    horst Guest

    Hope I can elucidate here:

    The criteria is who looked like the best fighter in his time in each division, who in their time there performed best against the best comp. Things like longevity and achievements are not relevant, merely how good they looked and who it was against.
     
  5. bodhi

    bodhi Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,229
    257
    Oct 22, 2009
    I'm not high on Jones as you are. Jones was a great fighter and looked definitly unbeatable but I don't think he was. I don't think Jones was faster than Joe C. and if not by much. Yep, Jones hit harder than anyone Calzaghe fought during his reign. But Jones never fought one like Calzaghe although. I think Calzaghe's own speed, workrate and awkwardness would pose a big problem to Jones.

    What I mean is that Winky's very good defense and him throwing around or over 1,000 punches might win him a decision over Hearns.

    The division was abolished and restarted. That's right. I disagree however that we can just ignore half of the divisions history.

    I think there is the misunderstanding. Not every contender was able to become champ. Likewise here. Not everyone that deserves a mention can be champ. You mentioned Chavez, I'd pick Cervantes over him.

    Would be a great fight. Likewise I don't see Chavez or Mayweather beating Arguello and still they deserve beeing mentioned as contenders. As does Nelson.
     
  6. teeto

    teeto Obsessed with Boxing banned

    28,075
    54
    Oct 15, 2007
    Here's what i said last time it came up Popkins

    'My opinion is that it's more difficult than people think. On the contrary to the opinion of the masses i think that Jones' best shot is to win by ko. Calzaghe dictates the pace of fights so well, hundred miles an hour and has that multi directional mobility from his feet. He's a fast working ring general. Only one man ever dictated the pace against Calzaghe, and slowed it down, that was a master boxer named Bernard Hopkins. As great a fighter and as much a force of nature Jones is, he doesn't fight like Hopkins one bit. Jones is so fast and has one shot power, i don't think he could outbox an enigma that is Calzaghe, but i reckon he could blast him out of the blue and follow it up.

    It's really difficult for me to say. '

    But if you're simply of the opinion that styles don't play a part and that Jones is just better then i do actually see where that opinion comes from, but i don't fully agree.
     
  7. bodhi

    bodhi Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,229
    257
    Oct 22, 2009
    The greatest, not necessarily the best. Jones may very well be the best.
     
  8. cuchulain

    cuchulain Loyal Member Full Member

    36,586
    11,624
    Jan 6, 2007

    Fair enough.

    i took you to mean who would have prevailed over all others in the division on a h2h basis.
     
  9. horst

    horst Guest

    I do think styles play a part, but I have a very different idea from you of how the styles of Jones and Calzaghe would mesh. I think Jones would completely outclass Joe. I know it's hard to envisage that because Joe never fought anyone in the condition to dominate him like that, but that doesn't mean it couldn't happen. Of course it could, and with Jones it would. A highly motivated Roy Jones would pick Joe Calzaghe apart. Jones at 168 was too fast and too powerful, and Joe's defence just isn't equipped for a fighter like RJJ. JMHO mate
     
  10. horst

    horst Guest

    My bad. My criteria was not as clear as it should have been.
     
  11. cuchulain

    cuchulain Loyal Member Full Member

    36,586
    11,624
    Jan 6, 2007
    All's fine.

    That you're still up at this hour of the night, must indicate that you're going to watch the fight live ?
     
  12. teeto

    teeto Obsessed with Boxing banned

    28,075
    54
    Oct 15, 2007
    Well Jones was so much of a physical monster in his prime that him playing the part of superman against Calzaghe is not a stretch of the imagination. I don't know if it would happen myself though. I rate Calzaghe head to head personally, he's hardly perfect but he is adaptable and while his punching form is far from textbook, stylistically he is somewhat of a technician. Jones was never technical, that's why once the legs have deteriorated he has incurred losses that could never happen in his younger days. In hindsight whn you analyze his performances it's all physical, he won due to speed, power etc. Now when i look at Calzaghe who had quality circular movement type footwork, i can see that to beat him is to slow his pace of operation. I never thought someone could do that until Hopkins did it. Now Jones is never the boxer to do that, which is why when i really sit and ponder the match up i can't see Jones outboxing him. Calzaghe is a fast operator in terms of actually boxing. Jones is just fast. I think Jones could knock him out with a right hand though and he very well might, Calzaghe was hurt by the better caliber of hitter in his career.
     
  13. teeto

    teeto Obsessed with Boxing banned

    28,075
    54
    Oct 15, 2007
    Of course man, England is alive tonight.
     
  14. GPater11093

    GPater11093 Barry Full Member

    38,034
    91
    Nov 10, 2008
    Cruiserweight: Evander Holyfield
    Super Middleweight: Roy Jones Jr
    Light Middleweight: Emile Griffith
    Light Welterweight: Wilfred Benitez
    Super Featherweight: Alexis Arguello
    Super Bantamweight: Wilfredo Gomez
    Super Flyweight: Jiro Watanabe
    Light Flyweight: Jung Koo Chang
    Minimumweight: Ricardo Lopez
     
  15. teeto

    teeto Obsessed with Boxing banned

    28,075
    54
    Oct 15, 2007
    Under this criteria Watanabe is a clear front runner amongst some others at 115, easily.