I'm saying it if it hasn't been said already. Clottey was paid to lose this fight.

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by HyperUppercut, Mar 14, 2010.


  1. cloud_cyc

    cloud_cyc p4p demon Full Member

    2,802
    0
    Jul 12, 2009
    chill the **** down ja rule! :lol:
     
  2. sean

    sean pale peice of pig`s ear Full Member

    10,097
    1,091
    Jul 19, 2004
    styles make fights.

    odlh said exactly what would happen in this fight and that it would be easy for paq.

    the analysis of what would happen, why it would happen and how it would happen was correct .

    working out styles in a lot of fights is fairly easy to do and bookies use things like form and style to predict odds.

    there was no fix/ no con and no surprise in the fight.

    it would have been more entertaining if clottey knowing he was way behind , went out on his shield and threw the kitchen sink leaving himself open to counters and this is what paq would have done if he had needed to but not what cautious fighters like clottey do.
     
  3. bandido

    bandido The Black Bandit Full Member

    6,638
    2
    Feb 25, 2010
    don't know which one to believe: clottey getting paid to lose or you paying for the fight...Nah, I think clottey is really an alien and the CIA had a hand in all this.
     
  4. Styles do make fights but contrary to pac sucking belief, clottey style is actually a great style to beat pacs. Pac does not have this o so great hard to break style. He just has high energy and great stamina (I wonder why). But the Spartan soldier like defense/offense would break pac down if clottey added more spear and less shield to the mix you feel me? Pac was getting winded and slower and all clottey had to do was keep countering. You don't know **** about styles and you don't know **** about boxing.
     
  5. Delroc

    Delroc Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,324
    7
    Jan 14, 2009
    the same dude that was calling us all racists cause we dont like mayweather.
     
  6. Boom_Boom

    Boom_Boom R.I.P Boxing 6/9/12 Full Member

    38,281
    13
    Sep 21, 2006
    TS never saw a Clottey fight in his life
     
  7. obviously you didnt read that thread correctly mu****a. I clearly said you were racist for supporting pac and his bull****. Not for disliking mayweather. If your reading comprehension was a good as your cocksucking you would understand alot more ****.
     
  8. Saw most of them and was even beginning to respect him and his underdog story until I saw that this mu****a was throwing the fight. Please explain how clottey doesn't take one risk when he is clearly ****ing pac up everytime he throws. please explain that instead of saying stupid ****.
     
  9. sean

    sean pale peice of pig`s ear Full Member

    10,097
    1,091
    Jul 19, 2004
    what are you some kind of 18 year old not long of his mother`s tit.

    your opening post shows your knowledge of boxing.

    muppet.
     
  10. The typical **** that dumbasses say, when they have no more boxing knowledge to spew. Please explain how clottey is tailor made for pac when he was punching strong as **** and ****ing pac up when he actually showed some offense.
     
  11. NoHomeJerome

    NoHomeJerome Boxing Junkie banned

    8,229
    0
    Feb 14, 2010
    He banged Pac with some full on uppercuts and right hands, obviously wouldn't do that if he was paid to take a dive.
     
  12. Ilesey

    Ilesey ~ Full Member

    38,201
    2,599
    Jul 22, 2004
    Faily Failerton
    Failville
    Fail Close
    Fail Road
    Fail
     
  13. He would have done it more if he wasn't paid to take a dive.
     
  14. Ilesey

    Ilesey ~ Full Member

    38,201
    2,599
    Jul 22, 2004
    I would hardly claim that landing a few single punches here and there constitutes as ****ing Pac up. It was the other way around. Pac beat the ever loving crap out of him.
     
  15. EricGN

    EricGN Active Member Full Member

    763
    7
    May 4, 2009
    Kindly please post a "facepalm" picture in this thread...