Sanchez and Monzon?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by teeto, Mar 15, 2010.


  1. enquirer

    enquirer Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,206
    26
    Mar 18, 2006
    Yes,that is what i think some folks greatly overlook when looking at fighters like monzon and calzaghe,ring generalship. I mean these guys might not be as dynamic or as technically aesthetic as the jones' or hopkins' of this world,but they seem to have an unorthodox,innate perception of range,balance and how to be 'on top' of the other fighter.
    Guys like prime JCC and duran do this as well,but it looks more dramatic and pronounced with these guys at times because they generally use more power and 'forward agression',while the aformetioned two use a persistant jab or a swarming form of punching on the back or front foot as the occasion merits. This indeed,is the highest form of being a complete boxer.
    I think sweet pea and robinson also fall into this category,and maybe leonard. (chavez i dont think is complete,because he doesnt fight of the back foot,duran is complete as he can counter punch off the back foot,And he has some degrees over monzon and calazaghe in that he can be a ring general even when he is physically outspeed,outgunned and outsized,thus the perfect ring general.hence his longevity and sucess.)
     
  2. teeto

    teeto Obsessed with Boxing banned

    28,075
    54
    Oct 15, 2007
    Nice post, but one thing, from a technical standpoint, Jones is not in the same stratosphere as Hopkins, even if he was a better fighter for effectiveness. Anyway i'm off now to get ready for the game, thanks for the replies.
     
  3. enquirer

    enquirer Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,206
    26
    Mar 18, 2006
    Oh i agree,i meant jones as 'dynamic',not technically aesthetic,my dodgy grammer...
     
  4. teeto

    teeto Obsessed with Boxing banned

    28,075
    54
    Oct 15, 2007
    Ha no problem enquirer.
     
  5. GPater11093

    GPater11093 Barry Full Member

    38,034
    91
    Nov 10, 2008
    They have pressure as they are constanlty controlling the pace and the flow of the fight. Keeping their opponents 'on their toes' so to speak trying to break their controll but also the physcological effect of controllng their man.

    I see some similarities like you say but I always think Sanchez was much more fluid and dynamic in the way he moved and found angles.
     
  6. AlFrancis

    AlFrancis Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,812
    843
    Jul 25, 2008
    Just got to say what a great fighter I think Sanchez was, watching him you can see his brilliance.
    I saw a couple of posts recently about Humberto Soto and David Diaz talking about how good Soto looked. I was unimpressed. I've been watching Sanchez- Cowdell and Ruben Castillo like I said and I also watched the Rose-Castillo fight. That Soto Diaz fight paled in comparison as to the skills showed by the aforementioned fighters. The commentators were talking about him being a three weight champion. Armstrong, Ross and co would be turning in their graves.
     
  7. Mr Butt

    Mr Butt Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,678
    183
    May 16, 2009

    top post pater
     
  8. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    269
    Jul 22, 2004
    Sanchez and George Foreman, I know on first glance their boxing styles may seem far apart but look at it more closely. They both throw punches in the ring and try to hurt their opponent, they both try to win fights, both wear boxing gloves, they both fight in rings, **** when you look at it like that you've goto admit the styles are pretty similar
     
  9. teeto

    teeto Obsessed with Boxing banned

    28,075
    54
    Oct 15, 2007
    Yeah i mentioned the difference in fluidity etc, the similarities are strictly stylistic rather than anything that is derived from their attributes.
     
  10. teeto

    teeto Obsessed with Boxing banned

    28,075
    54
    Oct 15, 2007
    Eat my shorts powerpuncher, **** post.
     
  11. teeto

    teeto Obsessed with Boxing banned

    28,075
    54
    Oct 15, 2007
    Yeah Soto was quality for his angles to find combos, especially early, but faded down the stretch especially for workrate, which wasn't anything great to start with.
     
  12. teeto

    teeto Obsessed with Boxing banned

    28,075
    54
    Oct 15, 2007
    Just watching some more Sanchez, there are definite stylistic differences, Sanchez had more of a tendency to 'hunt' his man, but the similarities i mentioned seem ever present to me. If i'm wrong though i'm wrong, i've went out on one here a bit. I have testicular fortitude.
     
  13. AlFrancis

    AlFrancis Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,812
    843
    Jul 25, 2008
    Cojones:lol:
     
  14. teeto

    teeto Obsessed with Boxing banned

    28,075
    54
    Oct 15, 2007
    Melons mate. My youtube keeps ****ing up, i'm trying to finish off the fight now, i would have done it earlier but had to see the game man.
     
  15. red cobra

    red cobra Loyal Member Full Member

    38,042
    7,560
    Jul 28, 2004
    Both Monzon, and Sanchez, irrespective of their styles or any similarities between them, have something in common...the mystique...unique (I believe) amongst all Latin greats of history in that they never had their titles taken from them..Monzon of course after 14 successful defenses retiring at the top, and Sanchez, because of his untimely passing, still held the featherweight crown.