I'm saying it if it hasn't been said already. Clottey was paid to lose this fight.

I first read of this conspiracy theory in a post by Horus at B*****scene(who apparently has his own radio talkshow). It doesn't seem credible enough, yet it seems some peeps think this the new "Steriod/Cheater" angle.

 

Money from a rematch, money from sponsors, new sponsors, money from future fights against Mosley/Mayweather, international stardom, new advertising deals etc etc..

Yeah he threw all that away for $1.5m.

 

So he would take **** money as a pay off not not blasting Pac away so he could lose out massive mega fights and God knows how much money.

Please don't say I don't know **** mu****a when you clearly know absolutely **** all.

You are a waste of oxygen and you fail.

Mu****a. :roll:

 

You just can't reason with the mu****a. :blood

 

Yeah, he gets to fight Foreman instead of Mayweather or Mosley.

You fail.

:rofl

 

those uppercuts from clottey had no real venom. they were just pushed through, they never had a chance of hurting pacquiao. if you dont know this, get a clue on how to throw a punch.


the fight wasnt fixed tho, at least i dont think it was!! but it WAS a farce!! built up like clottey was gonna test pac, but everyone knew he never really was. a punchbag would have put up a better fight!!

 

Only special punchbags can give Pac some challenge. The one who fought Charlie Z is a very good opponent.

 

He would of never gotten the fight if he did not agree to that in the first place. He did not threw anything away. He got all that his going to get from throwing the fight away.

 

how about some paragraphs? not like this was worth reading anyways...