How much credit should Pac get for beating Clottey?

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by s23041983, Mar 16, 2010.


  1. mbrockett

    mbrockett ESB voyeur Full Member

    888
    0
    Jun 28, 2008
    what is this mythical P4P belt you speak of?

    by the way, just to confirm - is mayweather moseley for the welterweight ring belt? they are 2nd and 3rd ranked and the belt is vacant so technically they shouldnt be fighting for it.
     
  2. s23041983

    s23041983 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,180
    0
    Nov 12, 2008
    he agreed to a 50-50 split with pacquiao, what are u talking about? :patsch
     
  3. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล

    82,426
    1,478
    Sep 7, 2008
    Maidana :lol: he'd get annihilated in a round
     
  4. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล

    82,426
    1,478
    Sep 7, 2008
    Also, titles are meaningless
     
  5. Beeston Brawler

    Beeston Brawler Comical Ali-egedly Full Member

    46,399
    15
    Jan 9, 2008
    Not before trying to wangle a larger share first.

    What am I talking about.... what are you talking about trying to say that belts are important in this potential fight?

    ''World titles'' don't mean jack **** these days, and why should they when there is more than one within a particular weight class?
     
  6. s23041983

    s23041983 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,180
    0
    Nov 12, 2008
    te ring p4p belt is not vacant... pacquiao still holds it.

    he has to go down to 140 to defend his ring 140 title or he will be stripped of his p4p belt
    ............................................

    Manny Pacquiao has requested that he remain The Ring junior welterweight champion because he intends to defend the title following his March 13th bout with Joshua Clottey, his second consecutive fight at welterweight. The Ring has honored Pacquiao's request, but has informed him that if he does not defend the 140 pound title in his next fight, The Ring will consider in tantamount to relinquishing the belt and vacate the title.

    Nigel Collins, The Ring Magazine, April 2010
    .............................................
    if pacquiao wanted to stay at ww and keep his p4p title then all he has to do is challenge the winner of mayweather v mosley in his next bout, which means that if its mayweather he will have to agree to the testing. yet pacquiao isnt doing this, he is dropping the weight to fight a lesser fighter than floyd or mosley so he doesnt have to get tested or lose his title.
     
  7. kosaros

    kosaros Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    26,593
    5
    Jul 21, 2008
    I went for my tea and I am glad to see that you guys have already argued the point so I don't have to :good
     
  8. s23041983

    s23041983 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,180
    0
    Nov 12, 2008
    listen... the ring belt is important to floyd!! if he has it, he wont fight for less than 60% of the purse... which is a fight killer against pacquiao as arum would either have to accept the 40% or turn it down.

    it is also important enough for pacquiao to wanna go down to lww to defend it :deal
     
  9. mbrockett

    mbrockett ESB voyeur Full Member

    888
    0
    Jun 28, 2008
    sorry mate but you've got some crossed wires. they would strip him of his light welterweight ring title if he doesnt go down, not his position as p4p#1 (which isnt a belt by the way). i doubt he will lose that position unless he loses a fight.

    in terms of pacquiao going down to LWW - i'd still be suprised. even the ring seem to be tentatively accepting his request as if they're not sure. roach also said the clottey fight could be his last so dont assume any plan they have is fixed. the only possible fight pacquiao could take that would be worth his while down there is bradley - but i expect he is still hoping to get matched up with floyd and make his defining and last fight, before stepping fully into politics.
     
  10. s23041983

    s23041983 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,180
    0
    Nov 12, 2008
    very true. there IS yuri forman i suppose, but he cant hold onto that ring #1 spot if he fights people like forman, not when 2nd and 3rd placed fighters mayweather and mosley are fighting each other. the ring will move him down to number 2 if he keeps fighting guys who arent in their rankings. i think defending his ring LWW belt will keep him at #1 spot.
     
  11. s23041983

    s23041983 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,180
    0
    Nov 12, 2008
    gonna eat my tea. brb to continue the war of words :good......
     
  12. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล

    82,426
    1,478
    Sep 7, 2008
    You're totally missing the mark on the P4P no.1 spot pal. Floyd would have to do a lot to supercede what Pac has done. There's no mathematical way of losing the no1 P4P invade your form dips: there's a lot to be said for consistency, and there are fights that can keep Pac
    top of the pile. Unless Floyd fights loads of top fighters and Pac doesn't fight for a year or so; the fo book suggests this won't happen.

    It's a purely hypothetical ranking done by a magazine as to who the perceived best fighters in the world are: I don't look too much into it myself. You say 'PAC can only beat Foreman' who is Floyd gonna beat then to move up, because there's no one at 140 or 147 that Floyd could beat that Pac wouldn't IMO.
     
  13. s23041983

    s23041983 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,180
    0
    Nov 12, 2008
    so pacquiao is #1 and floyd is #2.... if floyd beats the #3 and pac beat clottey (who isnt even ranked there), then floyd will not get put to #1?:think

    also, do you think there were better fights for pacquiao at LWW than fighting clottey @ WW? more challenging fights i mean, where the purse would have been bigger too?
     
  14. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล

    82,426
    1,478
    Sep 7, 2008
    No, because Pac is far more accomplished in terms of opposition faced than Floyd.

    By your rationale, if Alex Arthur would somehow score an upset over Pac, he'd be p4p no.1. Don't work like that mate.
     
  15. s23041983

    s23041983 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,180
    0
    Nov 12, 2008
    in that case, if cotto had beaten pacquiao, then cotto would not have been #1? :huh