Liston or Foreman? Who was better? My breakdown on 11 categories

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Mendoza, Mar 18, 2010.


  1. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. banned Full Member

    55,255
    10,352
    Jun 29, 2007
    Liston or Foreman? Who was better? My breakdown on 11 categories

    I have seen dozens of threads on who was the better. As a fan of both who has seen both of them on at least 10 different occasions here is my break down on 11 separate categories.

    Power: Both Liston and Foreman rank among the hardest hitters ever. Liston’s could hurt you with his jab alone. His right cross was fierce, his left hook could knock down a wall, and his uppercut was a fishing type of blow as well. Liston hit the heavy bag harder than anyone I saw on film. Foreman much like Liston had a heavy jab, a thunderous cross, a booming hook, and a head snapping type of uppercut. Liston punched more form the shoulders, Foreman got more leverage in his hips and legs. Both Foreman and Liston could hammer the body too. There is little difference between the two. Call it a draw.

    Size: Defined as a full-blown tale of the tape. Liston was not very tall, but he certainly had some super heavyweight like dimensions. Among them were an 80+-inch reach, 15" fists, big legs, big arms wide shoulders, and a thick neck. Foreman was taller, slightly heavier, and slightly more muscled, but he had less reach. I give Foreman a slight edge here.

    Skills on Offense: Liston was a rare technical type of fighter with his four basic punches. Liston could excel at either in-fighting or out fighting. Some feel Liston had the best jab among heavyweights. I disagree a bit but its certainly arguable. Liston was perhaps the most complete offensive heavyweight of all time. He could box, brawl or slug at arms length, mid-distance or close distance, and land any punch with good technique. Wow. Liston could also combo off his jab a bit. Foreman was more of a bar room brawler who did not rely much on technique. In fact he did not even care if he had technique or not. As far as Foreman was concerned it was the other person needed technique. Foreman came for the school of Rocky Marciano and tried to KO his man with just about every punch he threw. Foreman could miss badly, or be countered. Big edge to Liston on skills.

    Skills on Defense: Defined as the ability make the other guy miss, punch anticipation, clinching, block shots with the gloves, base guard stance, use of footwork to get out of the way, and covering up. Liston had a classic high guard, and those huge fists made it even harder to land something solid on. Liston also had quality head movement, which is rare among heavyweights. Sonny did not have to block or clinch much, so he did not develop these type of skills. Foreman defense was mostly his offense. Foreman wanted to land and put pressure on the other guy. His guard geared toward offense, and he did not move his head much. Clinching for Foreman was reserved for pushing the other fighter back wards! Neither guy had top punch anticipation. Liston could make the other guy miss and get out of the way at times. Advantage to Liston.

    Hand and foot speed: If Liston had a weakness it was average hand speed. I think Foreman, who was by no means fast handed, might have a small edge on Liston hand speed. Both Liston and Foreman had relatively quick feet for big guys, and could cut off the ring on smaller boxers. I do think Foreman was just a tad more dynamic overall, so give him the slightest edge here.

    Quality of competition fought: Liston resume outside of Ali is a bit thin by the standards of all time greats, with Patterson, Machen, Folley, and Williams being his best opponents. Foreman fought a who’s who of the 60’s and 70’s. Frazier, Norton, Chavalo, Lyle, Young, etc… I am focusing on both fighters in their primes, but Foreman also fought top opposition in the 1990's as well. Big edge to Foreman.

    Chin: Both fighters had top chins. Liston did not face as many punchers or get hit with as many bombs as Foreman did, so his chin is a bit more untested. I do think Liston could be hurt a tad easier than Foreman, who was only stopped once in his long ring career. Foreman’s stoppage loss was stamina related than anything else. Advantage to Foreman

    Stamina: Liston had excellent stamina, and could fight a hard 12 rounds with plenty left in the tank. Liston never had to go 15 rounds, but based on how he looked vs Machen in the 12 round match, I think Liston was a true 15 round fighter. Foreman main weakness was suspect stamina in the mid to later rounds. Part of this was poor punch management by Foreman. Later in his career, Foreman wise up a bit and was more judicious with his reserves. Advantage to Liston.

    Heart: Liston deep down was a bully, a thug and a quitter. The thing is very few fighters could last long enough to test these intangibles. When things did not go Sonny’s way, he often fouled. Liston quit vs Ali, and likely took a dive in the other fight. In other fights he was accused of putting a burning like liquid substance on his gloves. Foreman’s fighting heart seemed to be very good, except in the Ali match where I think he mentally packed it in, and in the Young match were Foreman was concerned about gassing late. Edge to Foreman.

    Ring Generalship: Liston knew what the other guy had, and did not have. Liston was a rare fighter who matched up well vs punchers, swarmers and boxers. Liston never punched himself out, or was out thought in the ring. In general he fought the right type of fight. Foreman’s ring generalship was questionable. It cost him vs Ali. If Foreman would have simply 1-2’d Ali on the ropes, then backed off and collected his breath, he would have forced Ali to change things up. Foreman should have clinched more often when he was tired, but did not. Foreman never took rounds off to catch a second wind either. Advantage to Liston

    Intimidation / Killer instinct: Oh Boy. Foreman was so big and strong many thought he was unbeatable. Big punchers with tough chins who go all out are always highly feared. Intimidation was a big weapon of Foreman, and once he had you hurt, that was it. But deep down, I think Foreman was a somewhat fearful guy. Liston was a street thug. A man who has in many fights in and out of the ring with other citizens and the cops. Liston was also a mob enforcer. It is safe to say Liston went though some real life and death situations in and out of prison. You just can't replicate that without experiencing it. Liston pioneered the stare down as a weapon, and seemed to scare his opponents stiff to the point where one got the feeling the match might end right after the stare down. Even Ali was scared of Liston. Small edge to Liston.

    Tally:

    Liston:5
    Foreman: 5
    Draw : 1
     
  2. MAG1965

    MAG1965 Loyal Member banned

    34,796
    65
    Dec 1, 2008
    I think Foreman. He fought more elite and guys his size and didn't have big advantages over them. You can mention Frazier as being smaller, but no one is going to say Frazier didn't have a chance.
     
  3. PetethePrince

    PetethePrince Slick & Redheaded Full Member

    28,760
    83
    May 30, 2009
    Seen plenty of Liston hitting the heavy bag and Marciano hits the Heavy Bag equally as impressive. Foreman just demolishes the heavy bag... it's not even close and would love to see what you've seen because I don't see how Liston hits the heavy bag equal. Foreman edges him in power.

    :happy



    Foreman had heart, no doubt. He got up against Ali too so I don't see him packing it in just not fighting smart.




    I agree with the rest of your post, which seems to be on-point. Good thread. Foreman is definitely more accomplished, but Liston is better on paper.
     
  4. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,883
    47,854
    Mar 21, 2007
    I disagree with the following:

    Size. Foreman has 3 inches in hegiht, Liston has 2 inches in reach. To me, the difference in reach is more crucial, but you can argue that these two cancel each other out. Foreman weighed 4lbs more for their respective best performances, which is nothing. As to how muscled each man is, this is irrelevant. This is tied or for Liston, probably tied.


    Hand and foot speed. Foreman had slightly faster feet, overall, Liston had faster hands. Throwing these two in together makes rating it really, really difficult, and i'd probably see it tied for this reason.


    Intimidation/Killer Instinct. No difference IMO.
     
  5. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,883
    47,854
    Mar 21, 2007
    I think that if Liston and Foreman swapped, Foreman would scare Ali and Liston wouldn't.
     
  6. Pusnuts

    Pusnuts Active Member Full Member

    1,432
    7
    Jun 23, 2009
    Foreman is stronger and a more powerful puncher, slightly better chin, Liston a better jab and faster hands
     
  7. MRBILL

    MRBILL Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    21,116
    110
    Oct 9, 2008
    Liston was better in a technical sense. However, head-2-head in a time machine, I'd bet Foreman to KO Liston overall....... Styles make fights........ Foreman struggles early with Liston, but finally gets home and KO's Liston...... Foreman has more willpower and a better jaw.......

    I'm talkin' Foreman of 1973 to the Liston of 1962....

    NOTE: Merchant said something after the 8th or 9th round when Foreman fought Holy in 1991 to the degree that Foreman could pack-it-in at any time and nobody would whine or fault Foreman.... BUT! Foreman fought on......... Foreman lost, but he was heroic.... Liston would've spat out the mouthpiece in the corner......

    MR.BILL
     
  8. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,718
    29,052
    Jun 2, 2006
    This is a pretty good analysis ,but I disagree with a couple of points.

    Liston had much better head movement ,and ,importantly punch anticipation.Foreman relied on his gloves to block punches.

    Liston was also good inside,with hooks to body and short uppercuts to the sides and chest area.

    Foreman needed room to get off as he was basically a long puncher,[ in his first incarnation anyway].

    George would push you back by the shoulders to get you at the end of his looping swings.

    Liston's jab was a monster ,but could be self defeating ,as it often pushed his opponent back out of range ,and Sonny rarely followed it up with as much as a hook ,let alone a combo.
    Liston's achilles heel was his foot work he had what has been called the "Chicago style", three steps then jab regroup and start again.
    Liston NEVER learned to cut off the ring, he followed you around.
    Foreman was great at laterally reducing the size of the ring,he understood ring geometry very well, big plus for him here.
    Liston was the better boxer,Foreman ,probably slightly more powerful ,imo.
    I broadly agree with the rest of the post.
     
  9. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. banned Full Member

    55,255
    10,352
    Jun 29, 2007
    Liston or Foreman? Who was better? My breakdown on 11 categories

    I have seen dozens of threads on who was the better. As a fan of both who has seen both of them on at least 10 different occasions here is my break down on 11 separate categories.

    Power: Both Liston and Foreman rank among the hardest hitters ever. Liston’s could hurt you with his jab alone. His right cross was fierce, his left hook could knock down a wall, and his uppercut was a fishing type of blow as well. Liston hit the heavy bag harder than anyone I saw on film. Foreman much like Liston had a heavy jab, a thunderous cross, a booming hook, and a head snapping type of uppercut. Liston punched more form the shoulders, Foreman got more leverage in his hips and legs. Both Foreman and Liston could hammer the body too. There is little difference between the two. Call it a draw.

    Size: Defined as a full-blown tale of the tape. Liston was not very tall, but he certainly had some super heavyweight like dimensions. Among them were an 80+-inch reach, 15" fists, big legs, big arms wide shoulders, and a thick neck. Foreman was taller, slightly heavier, and slightly more muscled, but he had less reach. I give Foreman a slight edge here.

    Skills on Offense: Liston was a rare technical type of fighter with his four basic punches. Liston could excel at either in-fighting or out fighting. Some feel Liston had the best jab among heavyweights. I disagree a bit but its certainly arguable. Liston was perhaps the most complete offensive heavyweight of all time. He could box, brawl or slug at arms length, mid-distance or close distance, and land any punch with good technique. Wow. Liston could also combo off his jab a bit. Foreman was more of a bar room brawler who did not rely much on technique. In fact he did not even care if he had technique or not. As far as Foreman was concerned it was the other person needed technique. Foreman came for the school of Rocky Marciano and tried to KO his man with just about every punch he threw. Foreman could miss badly, or be countered. Big edge to Liston on skills.

    Skills on Defense: Defined as the ability make the other guy miss, punch anticipation, clinching, block shots with the gloves, base guard stance, use of footwork to get out of the way, and covering up. Liston had a classic high guard, and those huge fists made it even harder to land something solid on. Liston also had quality head movement, which is rare among heavyweights. Sonny did not have to block or clinch much, so he did not develop these type of skills. Foreman defense was mostly his offense. Foreman wanted to land and put pressure on the other guy. His guard geared toward offense, and he did not move his head much. Clinching for Foreman was reserved for pushing the other fighter back wards! Neither guy had top punch anticipation. Liston could make the other guy miss and get out of the way at times. Advantage to Liston.

    Hand and foot speed: If Liston had a weakness it was average hand speed. I think Foreman, who was by no means fast handed, might have a small edge on Liston hand speed. Both Liston and Foreman had relatively quick feet for big guys, and could cut off the ring on smaller boxers. I do think Foreman was just a tad more dynamic overall, so give him the slightest edge here.

    Quality of competition fought: Liston resume outside of Ali is a bit thin by the standards of all time greats, with Patterson, Machen, Folley, and Williams being his best opponents. Foreman fought a who’s who of the 60’s and 70’s. Frazier, Norton, Chavalo, Lyle, Young, etc… I am focusing on both fighters in their primes, but Foreman also fought top opposition in the 1990's as well. Big edge to Foreman.

    Chin: Both fighters had top chins. Liston did not face as many punchers or get hit with as many bombs as Foreman did, so his chin is a bit more untested. I do think Liston could be hurt a tad easier than Foreman, who was only stopped once in his long ring career. Foreman’s stoppage loss was stamina related than anything else. Advantage to Foreman

    Stamina: Liston had excellent stamina, and could fight a hard 12 rounds with plenty left in the tank. Liston never had to go 15 rounds, but based on how he looked vs Machen in the 12 round match, I think Liston was a true 15 round fighter. Foreman main weakness was suspect stamina in the mid to later rounds. Part of this was poor punch management by Foreman. Later in his career, Foreman wise up a bit and was more judicious with his reserves. Advantage to Liston.

    Heart: Liston deep down was a bully, a thug and a quitter. The thing is very few fighters could last long enough to test these intangibles. When things did not go Sonny’s way, he often fouled. Liston quit vs Ali, and likely took a dive in the other fight. In other fights he was accused of putting a burning like liquid substance on his gloves. Foreman’s fighting heart seemed to be very good, except in the Ali match where I think he mentally packed it in, and in the Young match were Foreman was concerned about gassing late. Edge to Foreman.

    Ring Generalship: Liston knew what the other guy had, and did not have. Liston was a rare fighter who matched up well vs punchers, swarmers and boxers. Liston never punched himself out, or was out thought in the ring. In general he fought the right type of fight. Foreman’s ring generalship was questionable. It cost him vs Ali. If Foreman would have simply 1-2’d Ali on the ropes, then backed off and collected his breath, he would have forced Ali to change things up. Foreman should have clinched more often when he was tired, but did not. Foreman never took rounds off to catch a second wind either. Advantage to Liston

    Intimidation / Killer instinct: Oh Boy. Foreman was so big and strong many thought he was unbeatable. Big punchers with tough chins who go all out are always highly feared. Intimidation was a big weapon of Foreman, and once he had you hurt, that was it. But deep down, I think Foreman was a somewhat fearful guy. Liston was a street thug. A man who has in many fights in and out of the ring with other citizens and the cops. Liston was also a mob enforcer. It is safe to say Liston went though some real life and death situations in and out of prison. You just can't replicate that without experiencing it. Liston pioneered the stare down as a weapon, and seemed to scare his opponents stiff to the point where one got the feeling the match might end right after the stare down. Even Ali was scared of Liston. Small edge to Liston.

    Tally:

    Liston:5
    Foreman: 5
    Draw : 1


     
  10. PetethePrince

    PetethePrince Slick & Redheaded Full Member

    28,760
    83
    May 30, 2009
    Does anything get changed if we know that Foreman was drained a bit?
     
  11. PetethePrince

    PetethePrince Slick & Redheaded Full Member

    28,760
    83
    May 30, 2009

    ... but Liston did.
     
  12. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,883
    47,854
    Mar 21, 2007

    If we use their respective weights from their fights with Ali, Liston is 215/218 and Foreman is 220. There just isn't any real weight difference between them.
     
  13. Stonehands89

    Stonehands89 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,774
    312
    Dec 12, 2005
    Interesting stuff, Mendoza. A pleasure to read. Comments below...
    Agreed.

    I'd rename this category "Physical Strength" and give the edge to Liston. Forget the stats -Liston was unnaturally strong and it showed. As it is, I think that it should be a draw. They're too close to give an advantage and what is the relevance of size anyway? History has proven that among HWs, it matters little. Functional size/strength matters somewhat though skills usually matter more.

    Agreed...

    This category is not so relevant here because neither man had much nor needed much speediness. They physically overwhelmed their opponent or in Liston's case, combined strength and power with skill. If they had speed, they'd have been different fighters. A man probably cannot have the Foreman/Liston tape of power and have speed as well. Their arms are catapults, not lightning rods.

    Yes.

    Yes. Liston's KO by Martin was clean. Foreman fought on when he was older than Liston and was an oak tree.

    Agreed.

    Edge to Foreman, but I don't like to hear the word bully thrown around at Liston. He was a thug, yes, and a violent alcoholic, sure, and an all-around bad guy, absolutely. But to insinuate that he picked on smaller people misses the plain fact that Liston would just as easily slap a 265 wrestler to the ground or put a cop upside down in a garbage can and take his gun. Or fight 10 cops at once.

    The guy wasn't a "bully" anymore than Duran was a "bully." That epithet originated with Dundee, who sought to make Ali and Leonard look like heroic archetypes. Don't buy it.

    --BIG edge to Liston.

    Foreman tried to be Liston. Foreman was more or less labelled as Liston Jr. by the press in the seventies.

    OR!

    Liston: 5
    Foreman: 4
    Draw: 2

    Critique: Do you define ring generalship as "tactical and strategic ability"--? If so, it is an unusual definition. Most would absorb offensive and defensive skill in there as well as the ability to control an opponent.
     
  14. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,883
    47,854
    Mar 21, 2007
    Ring Generalship is range and tempo. You can throw all that other stuff out. The guy controlling the place the fight takes place and the rapidity it takes place at is the general.
     
  15. Lobotomy

    Lobotomy Guest

    Stoney, if you recall, Milt Bailey, a corner man for both Liston in Miami and Frazier in the Philippines, was interviewed years after Manila about the differences between the two, and he did say on camera that, "Liston was a bully, while Frazier was a bulldog." Coming from Dundee, this might be taken with more of a grain of salt. As it was declared by one of Sonny's own employees in such an openly public forum, it becomes more of a challenge to dismiss.