Joshua Clottey does not have an effective defence

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by horst, Mar 19, 2010.


  1. paloalto00

    paloalto00 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,268
    5
    Mar 15, 2009
    That wasn't what I said now was it???? Does it make his defense any less better if he is or isn't winning the fight??
     
  2. horst

    horst Guest

    It makes his defence 'less better' if his defensive style means he is a pinata that can't stop his man unloading on him.
     
  3. I think you guys are missing the point. Yes, holding your hands over your face for 12 rounds like a coward will make it much harder to punch you in the face. But it's not an effective defense as it allows you no opportunity to compete as a boxer.

    If your rationale for quantifying how good Clottey's defense is is punch stats, then wouldn't his defense be the best ever if he hopped out of the ring at the first bell and knocked out one of the judges and been DQed? He wouldn't have taken a single punch then. Pacquiao's connect percentage would've been 0.

    And hell, a DQ loss looks better on your record than a 12 round beatdown, anyway.
     
  4. paloalto00

    paloalto00 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,268
    5
    Mar 15, 2009
    Look who he was fighting, Pacquiao fights every round as if it were the 1st. Clottey's style doesn't make it great for counter punching, but I assure you not many punches are going to get through.
     
  5. horst

    horst Guest

    :deal
     
  6. horst

    horst Guest

    Joshua Clottey obviously wanted to hit Manny Pacquiao, but he was unable to do so because by the time he had peeked out from behind his guard, Pac has finished flurrying, and was changing position to start his next assault. For me, that is not an effective defence. In boxing, defence is not a passive/receptive thing. Yes, Clottey managed to make many punches hit his forearms instead of his face, but this in turn did not allow him to have any influence on the fight. And to be honest, his body was wide open and taking some vicious shots.
     
  7. paloalto00

    paloalto00 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,268
    5
    Mar 15, 2009
    What type of sense did that make? He basically said "If they didn't fight then I guess you would say his defense was still better huh." .... I guess you the JMM has better defense then Clottey then huh? After all he is one of the top dogs in counter-punching.
     
  8. paloalto00

    paloalto00 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,268
    5
    Mar 15, 2009
    You're judging Clottey's overall ability off of 1 fight.
     
  9. dangerousity

    dangerousity Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,253
    2,301
    Jan 4, 2005
    I think he has a good defense, just not a good at counterpunching. IMO counterpunching is a combination of good defense & offense, its when the 2 are combined that it becomes very good. Tyson was a counterpuncher but offensive minded, he would defend by slipping and counter with a hook or whatever punch he chose to throw. Mayweather is a counterpuncher but defensive minded. Clottey just seems to be defensive full stop.

    Pacquiao back in his BW/FW days was an offensive machine but his defense was not anywhere as good as it is today. What he lacked in defense he made up for in offense, just because his offense left him open afterwards as oppose to being in perfect position to avoid the incoming shots doesnt mean his offense was crap. It cant be done the other way though, you cant simply defend and win the fight because you survived, you can however simply attack and provided you survived and did more damage, doesnt matter your defense was crap, you can win.

    Thats why boxing is primarily Hit and secondary Not get hit.
     
  10. horst

    horst Guest

    If you wanted to be hypercritical (and many people believe such an attitude is justified when discussing Clottey's showing vs Pac), you could say that any boxer could do what Clottey does. A rank novice could hide behind a simple guard, it takes no skill or intuition to do that. Juan Manuel Marquez could easily have covered up every time he saw Pac move to strike, and he could probably have avoided being knocked down several times. But if he'd done that, he wouldn't have got so close to Pac over 24 rounds. Marquez is no Sweet Pea when it comes to defensive technique, but I still prefer his active defence to Clottey's passive.
     
  11. VanillaKilla

    VanillaKilla Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,611
    1
    Oct 31, 2008
    He has a good defense and a good ofense......

    However, he does not know how to mix them effectivly...

    In order to be a top fighter, you have to be on offense and defense AT THE SAME TIME

    Josh switches from offensive mode to defensive mode, his style is too static and predictable... Thats why he loses against top guys
     
  12. horst

    horst Guest

    This part made sense:

    And you can see my comment on Marquez in my previous post.
     
  13. Addie

    Addie Myung Woo Yuh! Full Member

    42,502
    392
    Jun 14, 2006
    I think Clottey has a good defense, which is to say he rarely gets hit cleanly. There's no reason why he can't make it work for him, he had ample opportunities against Miguel Cotto and Manny Pacquiao, the two best opponents of his career, to get more offensive work done without compromising himself.
     
  14. paloalto00

    paloalto00 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,268
    5
    Mar 15, 2009
    Hypercritical? That simple guard gave alot of top fighters hell, Clottey's losses are all to top fighters which he put them through hell to get. Like I said, you're judging his ability over 1 fight. Probably the only Clottey fight that you've watched.
     
  15. horst

    horst Guest

    I have to log off now, but I'll leave you with three quick points (welcome back by the way):

    - Clottey's body is always wide open to be hit

    - The punch stat numbers were, as always, bollocks. I rewatched the fight and Clottey was taking a shellacking at times, Pac was spearing shots through his guard pretty regularly. I think this was because Clottey can't move the way someone like Winky Wright does, who uses that defensive style much better than he does

    - Is a defence effective when it means you are a pinata with no way of stopping the punches coming?