A fun fact about Wladimir Klitschko...

You must have been hitting your head pretty hard when you wrote this ****.

Okay, in that case...

- Lewis beat Rahman quicker than WALDO
- Haye beat Barrett quicker than WALDO
- Audley Harrison beat Danny Williams quicker than VITLAY
- Khan beat Barerra quicker than Morales and Pac
- Danny Williams beat Tyson quicker than Holyfield

Great logic, buddy. :good

 

That really says it all right there. Don't know why this thread didn't end after that.

 

He's still boring though

 

Widdow, we as boxing fans knows Wlad can win fights by ko if he wants to. But don't brag about him got better ko percentege then other great great fighters like Ali (is not known as a fighter to ko ppl left and right), Tyson and so on. Valero is the only fighter with a perfect ko percentege then any active fighters right now. <<Is that mean Valero should be number 1 p4p?

 

for the love of god, wladmir klitschko got knocked the fck out by CORRIE SANDERS.....dont give me this bull**** about him being an undeveloped fighter etc....NONE of the great fighters youve mentioned have been destroyed so blatantly by a fighter of sanders' calibre....that includes Lewis (who was done by single shots each time, and kicked ass in rematches), or tyson (who was never fecked up so easily within a few rounds during his youth) or ali, or foreman, or dempsey....

find a fighter who has a solid chin, is quick, and has some decent power.....and wladmir will be fcked....the reason this hasnt happened, is because he is fighting heavyweights who are too afraid to let go, and are as about fast as 'fast' eddie chambers LOL

such a stupid thread

 

for a fuy with such a high ko percentage he fights like a *****.

 

and before someone whinges and says that what i wrote has nothing to do with p4p rankings....it damn well does.....

im not a huge fan of the p4p system, but for what its worth i think that you HAVE to consider the level of opposition faced and overcome by each respective fighter.....and it cant be determined solely by KO percentages....

the reason Foremans KO percentage was impressive was because you have to look at the bodies he knocked out, and the ROUNDS in which he achieved this...

the reason Tyson's Ko percentage was impressive...was because by 1988 he had achieved 26 KO's in 5 rounds or less and, 15 in the first round alone!...basically if tyson fought someone who wasnt worthy of being in the same ring as him, he made them LOOK like that in the ring aswell...

 

and???............

 

I don't see Larry Holmes KOing Sultan Ibragimov or Chris Byrd...

 

Then you're not a true boxing fan. A prime Holmes would destroy both Sultan and Bryd.

 

Mike Tyson not only got KO'd but was given a boxing lesson by Buster Douglas, he took a much more thorough and severe beating than Wlad did against Sanders.
Foreman got outboxed over 12 rounds by Jimmy Young.
Lewis getting destroyed by Rahman and McCall is equivocal to the Sanders debacle.

 

Tyson was in terrible condition for the Douglas fight. Your not implying that a full fit and prepared Tyson would have lost that match are you?

 

I'm not implying anything, Tyson was the undisputed HW champion of the world, in his prime, and he got spanked by Buster Douglas. I don't need to imply anything here, the event speaks for itself.

 

Unfortunately for Widdow_Maker, if Wlad was more exciting to watch, then more people here would agree with you, even if being exciting or not has nothing to do with the KO facts and his credentials...

Overall, Wlad has a very good resume and he beat good competition but made it look so easy that others will always say they were bums and there's no good heavyweights out there. The same was said for Larry Holmes & Lennox Lewis, amongst others.

When time goes by after Wlad retires, that's when people will evaluate him more objectively and realize he was something special...although quite boring to watch since after "Brewster I".

 

And about 184lb. :hi: Eddy Chambers beats any HW champ before Sonny Liston. FACT