A new perspective Tunney vs Ali, who wins?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by burt bienstock, Mar 22, 2010.


  1. burt bienstock

    burt bienstock Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,285
    400
    Jan 22, 2010
    How would the Gene Tunney, at his best,against Dempsey fare against 'Ali,both at their prime,15 rounds? Your opinions?
     
  2. itrymariti

    itrymariti Cañas! Full Member

    13,728
    46
    Sep 6, 2008
    Ali takes him to the cleaners.
     
  3. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,567
    Nov 24, 2005
    Close fight, would go the distance.
    Could go either way.
     
  4. Son of Gaul

    Son of Gaul Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,628
    30
    Feb 16, 2010
    Well, one would have to believe the fight would go the distance but I have a hard time seeing Tunney outpointing Ali.
     
  5. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    267
    Jul 22, 2004
    Ali mocks him ashe batters and stops him the way he did to other undersized LHWs like Patterson, Foster and Moore
     
  6. Lobotomy

    Lobotomy Guest

    Ali's height, reach and speed are the difference here. Gene would study him carefully, and make it a challenge, but Fleischer rated Muhammad as the fastest heavyweight in history. When Tunney had to deal with a faster opponent than himself, Greb gave him hell. Loughran was no picnic for Gene either. Ali had a combination of size, speed, mobility and durability Tunney never had to deal with.

    No knockdowns, no stoppage, a fairly uneventful distance bout with a clean decision going to Ali. Gene could outmaneuver and outbox a Marciano, Louis, Liston or Jeffries for 15 rounds. Ali and Holmes are a little too much for him to overcome though. Tunney would likely concentrate on the body for scoring purposes, but it wouldn't be enough. (Grantland Rice in fact did not think Gene's body attack was sufficient to earn the decision in the second Greb match.)
     
  7. PetethePrince

    PetethePrince Slick & Redheaded Full Member

    28,760
    83
    May 30, 2009
  8. guilalah

    guilalah Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,355
    306
    Jul 30, 2004
    In three fights: Ali by UD; Ali by SD; Tunney by SD. Tunneys exceptional stamina, in addition to his skill and smarts, keep him in two out of three fights.
     
  9. itrymariti

    itrymariti Cañas! Full Member

    13,728
    46
    Sep 6, 2008
    It's an utter mismatch. Ali has just about every advantage you could possibly conceive. Faster, rangier, better legs, better tools. He'd get to the punch first, control all of the exchanges and be the more physically imposing fighter. Tunney just has no way to get to him.
     
  10. Abdullah

    Abdullah Boxing Junkie banned

    8,257
    13
    Dec 2, 2008
    I would pick Ali by decision in this one. Tunney was a lot like Ali. He was the best boxer in the heavyweight division in his time and had great foot movement, timing and speed. Having said that, it is clear that Ali was faster, so that gives Ali a clear advantage, in my opinion. I don't think it would be easy though. Tunney was a tough customer. Ali himself spoke highly of Tunney when watching footage of the past heavyweight champions with Howard Cosell.
     
  11. Rock0052

    Rock0052 Loyal Member Full Member

    34,221
    5,875
    Apr 30, 2006
    Due to his ring IQ and skills, Tunney's a nightmare for guys he's faster than; that's not an advantage he'll have vs Ali and I don't think his ring genius would overcome the difference in size and speed Ali would have over him.

    Ali on points for me, but it wouldn't be easy.
     
  12. PetethePrince

    PetethePrince Slick & Redheaded Full Member

    28,760
    83
    May 30, 2009
    And equally as smart, regardless of how much Shakespeare Tunney reads.
     
  13. djanders

    djanders Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,065
    6,931
    Feb 21, 2009
    Interesting matchup. I wouldn't quickly dismiss Tunney's chances! At first glance it seems that both would box and move. This would make the fight a pure boxing match...mmm...slightly favoring Ali...in my opinion. But I'm not so sure it would go that way. One of them could decide to fight more aggessively. If so, the question becomes who would be the matador? Or would they take turns? Then again, Ali sometimes had problems with small heavyweights...and Tunney was brilliant at figuring out an opponent! If my back was against the wall, and I wanted to bet, I would bet on Ali...but I would be a bit uneasy about it.
     
  14. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,718
    29,052
    Jun 2, 2006
    Tunney went 15rds 6 times,in 4 of those fights he had significant weight advantages,in the other 2 there was no difference to speak of.

    Only 1 was a heavyweight, Bourke ,Dempsey's sparring partner.

    Tunney retired at age 32, he never had to concede great amounts of weight or age to an opponent.

    Ali went 15rds 14 times, in at least 9 of them he was past his best ,and ,fighting 200lbs or more heavyweights, all younger than himself.He was 36 when he regained the title from Spinks , and in his mid 30's when he finished stronger than a young Bugner in sweltering humidity.

    I see no evidence that Tunney had superior stamina to Ali

    Ali can do anything Tunney can, and, in the majority of cases better.U DEC for Ali.
     
  15. MRBILL

    MRBILL Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    21,116
    110
    Oct 9, 2008

    Ali and Tunney would be dreadfully dull, but Ali would be the master and controller of the bout from start to finish...... Ali too tall, fast and cagey for the slick but smaller Tunney in a time machine......

    Tunney loses like "Patterson, Ellis & Foster" did to Ali....... Tunney has nothing to keep Ali off of him.... Ali knows that too..........

    MR.BILL:hat