Decent athletes aren't enthralled with Wlad's talent .. only scrub non-athletic mouse clickers - which is 99% of the ESB pop .. it's demographics man. If you're a gimp you see greatness .. you're talking to a forum of scrub-ettes. Don't look for unbiased opinion around here .. it's like asking the deaf to rate music. You could go look for a forum of athletes to query - but athletes are in the gym - not making thousand upon thousand of posts about why Klit's dick smells nice or Joe Calz is an all-time fierce slapper. Don't waste too much time arguing with fools - if you met them you wouldn't bother to take them seriously - it's like asking a fat kid for his opinion on dieting. L8r.
Lewis fought an *immediate* rematch with Rahman and iced his ass in 4. Sanders is still waiting for his rematch with the younger Klit. Why is that?
Yeah, yeah, we know. They're all bums & **** right after Wladimir knocks them the **** out. :rofl "Rahman in decline.............." :rofl
There is no good part about fighting timidly against **** poor opposition, who you typically outweigh by 30-40 pounds, while putting the viewing audience to sleep in the process. Even HBO, the people who invented the Klitschko myth in the first place, have abandoned that sinking ship. Yeah, there is simply no other conclusion. Klitschko is a disgrace...
The HW division is just horrible. Almost all of the guys there are blown up or crap. The Klits can thank the NFL for their dominance.
Well, Rahman absolutely was in decline. Beyond "in decline", in fact - he was done. He'd been outboxed for periods and even rocked a bit by Zuri Lawrence. Plus Rahman was never very good to begin with. However - Eddie Chambers, Ruslan Chagaev, Sultan Ibragimov, Calvin Brock, and Sam Peter were all very formidable fighters at the time Klitschko beat them (and popped four of the five men's cherries). Klitschko's fought the best available and they've been mismatches because he is a well-crafted and well-oiled winning machine that is still well within its warranty term.
What I meant by that is that Rahman never was very "inclined" as in I never rated him that highly in the first place. To say he was in decline is to say that he actually had a prime.
What do you want the guy to do, build a time machine, go back to the early 90's, challenge Holyfield, Tyson, Bowe, Lewis and Ruddock all in the same month, then go balistic and try for the knockout in one round? Ain't gonna happen... The reality of the fact is, he is fighting and beating every man who they are putting in front of him, and its not his fault that you or anyone else think those guys are ****... He has beaten the best men available except for Haye and Valuev who won't fight him, or his brother which isn't going to happen... Famous boxing writer Nat Fleischer once spewed the very same crticisms about Joe Louis for fighting bums and stiff, and getting decked or floored by them..... Obviously time has a way of changing perception..
If Wladimir fought Alexander Povetkin or Denis Boytsov there is a very good chance he might lose and everyone knows that.