How dumb azz!!! Did you even read the post. If you did you would see that its incorrect cause floyd is not on their for many of those rankings. He is not even on the rankings list and he is 40-0!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! FAIL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1
No i am not saying that bro. He has Pacquiao ranked 4th on the records list and Floyd is not even on the list at all and his record is 40-0!!!! So how could that be right?????
Yes, punctuation marks are great but you, on the other hand, use way too ****ing many (and the wrong ones).
PAC's ranked 4th because PAC beat the best opponents out there. The numbers rank the boxer based on opponents' stats. In short, if you beat the best opponents, you go high in the ranks.
What are you talking about?? I am talking about him being 4th on the all time records list like wins and losses. He don't even have Mayweather on that list bro.
You are really beginning to look dumb and dumber each time you post. Once again, it is not my research. Second, it is a comparison between the established ATG (operative word - established) and Pac's accomplishment. Is Mayweather an established ATG already? Meaning is his place or ranking in ATG set already because that never happens until a fighter retires. This is not basketball where they already placed Shaquille O'Neal in the top 50 while he is still playing. Are you really that dense not to know the difference? Why don't you ask help from Nallege, he might explain it to you more succinctly because I really do not have the patience. If you say you are intilligent, let us leave it at that, and stop posting or starting a thread. That pedestal would crumble if you insist.
atsch Did you even read my post? I said PAC is 4th on that list because based on the opponents he beat. Now, if PBF fought the best welterweights before, he might be on that list.