King Arthur Abraham will absolutely obliterate Andre Dirrell's fragile Glass Jaw

you and I both know you dont believe a good 90% of the BS you just posted, your saying this simply to inflate abrahams somewhat lackluster resume and for nothig more. buddy, dont try and blow up these fighters from waht they truly are, thats not gonna help your argument. you can talk about "fighter A beat fighter B who beat a a better version then fighter C then fighter B ever will". its a flawed and stupid argument, point of the matter is non of their careers/wins are all that great. ive got this fight as a toss up, im not sold on either of them yet.

 

Is a better fighter than anyone Dirrell has beaten, i agree.

 

yea, he lost because he wasnt british, cant think of another reason why he didnt win a fight he deserved to win. anyone that isnt british couldve seen froch looked like an unskilled bum and swung at thin air for the entire fight. and when dirrell decided to commit he bounced frochs head like a basketball and landed at will. seriously, stop watching fights through a ****-a-scope man.

 

Yes, but many thought he beat Froch as well..It was up for debate...It was a close fight that could have went either way...Its not like Dirrell was blown out of the water...I can promise you this...If Froch and Dirrell meets again, Dirrell beats the dog **** out of Froch!

The whole point is that you're putting to much emphasis on the resume`...If you watched AA\Taylor...you'll see AA weakness...and Dirrell is going to exploit that...AA is not agressive enough and I can promise you this Dirrell will not pull a Jermane Taylor and sit in front of AA!

Not gonna happen!

You guys are seriously underrating and underestimating Dirrell! Cant wait until Saturday!

 

Howard Eastman would beat Froch? The same guy who lost to John Duddy?

Just repeat that so everyone knows your a joke.

 

exactly, some of the hopkins ballsuckers on here try and make out that was a great win on here just cos hopkins failed everytime he came up against a top fighter of equal weight he lost (jones, taylor twice, calzaghe).

 

Actually the majority of British fans had Dirrell winning too. :rofl

 

Of course Froch looked like ****, but even the US media guys at ringside weren't in agreement that Dirrell did enough to win. It was a very poor fight and tough to score because neither fighter really did anything, until the last few rounds when Dirrell actually let his hands go, but it wasn't enough over the course of the full 12 rounds to say that he won it clearly.

 

sometimes he trusts his bobbing and weaving too much without staying covered. that can be studied and exploited.

i have a feeling abraham is going to try to get him against the ropes to liimit his movement

 

**** me, you're painfully thick. Did Dirrell beat Froch? No, he lost. Hence why he has a '1' in the 'L' column on his record. Eastman is a better fighter than anyone Dirrell has beaten.

 

i just hope dirrell doesn't stink the entire arena out again. i'm surprised television companies are willing to show one of his fights again.

he'd be better off fighting on the comedy channel with tyson fury.

 

The majority of boxing fans know Dirrell beat Froch. You naming Howard Eastman just shows how **** your argument is. I cant wait till you're ass is exposed for the ass clown you are on saturday. mate.

 

Dirrell fought like a ***** against Froch, it was a poor performance aside from the last few rounds. The point is that Eastman is not Abraham's best win, it's probably barely top 5 in his best wins, but yet it is better than Dirrell's best win (which is probably Hanshaw or Oganov). Trying to claim - as someone did earlier - that there is nothing to choose between their records is just absurd.

 

:rofl You're reaching now!

 

Dirrell just turned pro until 2005. Of course Abraham is gonna have fought better oppositon.

Still doesnt change the that Froch is far and away a better fighter then anyone on Abrahams record, and that doesnt change the fact that Dirrell was robbed against Froch.

And I guess boxing and movement is ***** to you. I guess Ali was a ***** and so was Leonard vs Duran in fight number 2. But considering your lack of boxing knowledge I doubt you've ever even seen that fight.