King Arthur Abraham will absolutely obliterate Andre Dirrell's fragile Glass Jaw

Oh come on. I want to see Abraham win too, but you have to admit that was a hell of a shot

 

You call all that running Dirrell did boxing?

So what do you call all the falling and hugging he did?

:rofl:rofl

:|:|:|:|:|
What new terms will you use for that?



Waiting

 

Only if you knew this "caveman mind":hi:

 

That was a flush straight hand, that would of dropped anyone. Or at least buckled most.

I believe Dirrell has a decent chin. He took some of Froch's best punches, AND you can't say Froch is a light puncher.

 

rubbish - froch won the fight, the judges and boxing media got it right. dirrell is a runner and was trying to con the judges to win the title, he threw away the chance to fight for a world title.

 

:good Agree with that. If he grew a pair he could actually have won.

 

When a fighter does not come to fight and spends the night running from the opponent then you can not possibility call that a "Robbing". I understand you're a fan and all but yeah, If you run from a fight and then lose the fight its not a "Robbery" Its called "Negative Fighting" and the judges don't like it.

 

:tired Its not running its called "boxing" learn the term. Some boxers are actually athletes and dont need to fight like a bumbling caveman.

To see which is more effective, note the fact that Froch never even came close to hurting Dirrell, yet Dirrell for his so-called "running" hurt Froch atleast once visibly, and knocked him back several feet on more then one occasion.

There are judges that like the sweet science and then judges that think missing every punch you throw ala Carl Froch scores points. You can guess which ones are right.

 

He was running, I am not a fan of Carl Froch, in fact I think he is a trashing talking dick who thinks he is a lot better then what he is, and yeah he did occasionally stop running away and started trading and he won the exchanges! So why did he keep back peddling?

Thats not hate, thats not fan boy thats just an observation.

When you land shots on a guy, side step, move to the left and right, theres no need to be on the opposite side of the ring.

 

He lost because he wasn't British?... Seriously.

And lol

"Anyone that isn't British"

You should think about something right now, not every person in one country thinks the same thing. Everybody has a free will and everybody looks at things differently, regardless of country. I hate people like you, ****ing dumb ****.

 

Dirrell didnt have on exchange with Froch. At no point did they throw punches at the same time. Dirrell hurt Froch fighting off the ropes on the back foot, what boxers with his athleticism are able to do.

in the 11th he leaped in "tap tap" and leaped out. At no point did he reduce himself to trading with the caveman.

 

Yeah exactly, thats what I mean he stood and fought him and won, Froch couldn't do anything about it. And you keep calling Froch a caveman? A guy doesn't have to dance around the ****ing ring like a little fairy, some people like to mix it up. Its about styles, sorry but you just seem like a fan boy.

 

Again that dancing like a fairy, or running as you call it, its called boxing. Maybe you prefer fighters like Carl Froch to fighters like Leonard, Mayweather, Pep, Ali, Whitaker ect. Fighters who could box comfortably from the outside and frequently made fighters like Froch look silly, like Dirrell did. Froch barely landed a power shot in that fight. Even when he had Dirrell cornered against the ropes he couldnt land. Maybe missing punches is what you considered good technique.

Im sorry but if you had Froch winning even 5 rounds in that fight, you dont know **** about the sport.

 

I have already stated that I don't like Froch and that Dirrel was obviously more skilled. I am not a fan boy (Like you). But it is so so obvious that Dirrel was running, everybody knows it, go to youtube and look at fight predictions for AA V AD, everybody says he was running in fight, and I have only listened to American predictions so far and they are saying he was running. Dirrel has the skill to side stop, duck, weave and whatever, the mother ****er was running and if you don't think he was then you are nothing more then a fan boy! Don't try and discredit my boxing views just because they are not the same as your fan boy views. I am not going to trade little gay comments with a 13 year old fan boy. Froch lost the fight, obviously he was outskilled. But he came to engage, Dirrel just ran. Simple as that, only fan boys would say otherwise, that is why he lost because he showed a negative attitude and spoilt the fight. End of.

Logging off, feel free to argue back some more though.

 

Please point to me where Dirrell is running. Looks like comfortably boxing from the outside and using his legs to get in and out of range. show me where he is running. If anything I thought Dirrell didnt use enough movement

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ATrAhwIclhw[/ame]



So do you enjoy guys like Mayweather and Leonard?