What do you expect from a revisionist bunch- floydettes. Besides the AVY says it all - FRIGHTenedMONEY
I'm not a Floydette. Floyd has done many questionable things I don't agree with. I think he's a great fighter, but his ignorance bothers me Are you any better than a floydette when you worship Manny Pacquiao ?
Never worship the guy! Watch his fights but worship? Not me. I am actually more of a Floydette basher than anything else. Do you ever read me arguing that Pac would defeat Duran, SRL, Mosley, superman, batman? Or that Pac is so fast and powerful? He is just a boxer and his job is to enteretain me, just like any movie star. If he fails that job, then he does not interest me at all! But so far, even the Clottey fight is okay, not extremely interesting but hell better than watching a Mayweather fight. Floydettes on the other hand are fun, in idiotic way! They hate Pac to extreme yet they are the first ones to put up hypothetical match-ups - Pac vs. Duran, Pac vs. SRL, Pac vs. SRR. And if someone puts out an argument against their conceived outcome, they immediately start claiming they "owned", or name call that one a "*******". With this thread - it seems that the only acceptable answer is PW by KO. So why put up a thread? Where are the threads with Mayweather vs. everybody else- I should start tons of it.
i saw about 45 shoulder shoves and 56598683590685906839 elbows.......floyd is ****en lucky nobody calls him on his bull****, that's basically his style and a decent ref will make floyd fight, and his true colors will come out once he's on the floor KTFO.....i can't stand dirty fighters that get away with their nasty ****en styles to win most of their fights........ bhop and floyd should write a book on GETTING AWAY WITH DIRTY TACTICS WHILE OTHERS IDIOTS CALL IT "VETERAN MOVES"
And Castillo's low blows, and hitting on the break meant nothing to you I suppose? I had no problem with Castillo's veteran moves though, thats how you properly handle a slickster. You bang those hips baby till they cant move no more.
He won the first 4 for sure. Round 8 for sure, 10-8 round. And round 11 is more then possible. Thats 6 rounds right there.
Mayweather wins 8-4 on my card after viewing the fight 3 times. I didn't score the fight the first time around, but thought Castillo won a narrow decision. Upon rewatching on mute I realized Mayweather blocked most of Castillo's punches and won 8 rounds to 4.
8-4 you say,i think that if you watch it a couple more times you'll come to the conclusion that Floyd actually won by KO.
There must be something wrong with your brain if turning the volume down made you completely reverse your position. Why couldn't you see the punches being blocked with the volume up? Did the noise affect your eyes in some way?? If you are referring to biased commentary, then you must surely be around 10 years old, because no adult would be so swayed by mere commentary when they have the evidence in front of their eyes to make their own judgement. Are you incapable of seeing and interpreting events on your own, irrespective of what anyone else is saying?
True that the "blocked punches" shouldn't make any difference. But people can easily be swayed by biased commentary and coverage. Like a commentator that points out stats in fighter A's favor when every other stat is in fighter B's. Or reacting more to fighter A's clean shots than fighter B's, especially ones we can't see properly.