so AA complains about legit shots to the mid section but a full punch from AA to the face of a defenseless fighter is acting?
Just cause his head snapped around don't mean it was not acting. I agree, the dis Q was deserved, I guess, but the nonsense he was doing on the canvas was just that, nonsense.
I dont care if its acting or not it wasnt warranted for a DQ This site is full of hypocrites they cry and ***** when Soto gets DQ'd for hitting Lorenzo when he was clearly down, dont say **** when Margo hits Cotto when hes clearly down but pound their chests in anger when AA hits Dirrell when hes down.
Some people are just plain dumb. It was the 11th round. Dirrell was miles ahead on points. It was an illegal punch. There was no need for Dirrell to act, and if he was, then it was the most convincing and beliveable performance I have ever seen in my entire life. I don't think for one second that Dirrell acted.
The reason is opportunity to get the W right there and then ? why risk a 12th round ? why over exert yourself ? nobody is saying abraham would have won or even could have the right man got the W.
I'm not even going to debate this further. The idea that Dirrell pretended to be brutally KO'd, given the circumstances, is just ****ing ridiculous. I can't actually believe people are suggesting it. Laughable. atsch