Sauerland officially protesting the decision to DQ AA

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by KingCobra, Mar 28, 2010.


  1. phonk

    phonk Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,080
    0
    Oct 19, 2007
    His is a good actor, he is a good actor
     
  2. 20a87

    20a87 Boxing Addict banned

    6,682
    0
    Aug 22, 2009
    Dirrell was not ko'd like he made out that was farcical but AA should not have hit him.
     
  3. icemax

    icemax Indian Red Full Member

    27,158
    2
    Apr 24, 2008
    If the DQ is nailed on justified, why didn't Barrett get the same treatment when he lumped Haye flush when David was sat on his arse...storm in a teacup over a little tap that the little ***** made the absolute most of. AA shouldn't have done what he did, but Dirrel should have been thrown out for being a complete ****
     
  4. D-MAC

    D-MAC Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,294
    6
    Apr 15, 2008
    It was definitely a DQ, but I don't think the punch was a cynical one - not in the same league as Barrera's one on a downed Marquez.
     
  5. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล

    82,426
    1,478
    Sep 7, 2008
    Very good example:good
     
  6. BURNLEYBLUE

    BURNLEYBLUE Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,951
    1
    Feb 23, 2009
    Not a chance the decision will be overturned. But with the benefit of hindsight and replays the correct decision would be a no contest. Cos what that yellow backed, cheating **** did was far far worse than the instinctive 'slap' that Abrahams was guilty of.
     
  7. Boro chris

    Boro chris Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,275
    21
    Mar 14, 2005
    AA deserves to be DQ'd. I'm wondering weather AD made the most of it as well though. And that falling over he does to avoid getting hit needs to be sorted out by a strong ref. Twice in a row he's pulled that ****.

    Someone referred to him as the Drogba of boxing the other day.:D