Carl Froch was right about Dirrell...

When did i say abraham was going to beat dirrell????

I stated multiple times that if dirrell can get his mental game together, he can outbox abraham as he is the most talentend fighter of the division...

Stop making **** up, you are acting like a ****ing child man.....

 

Hatton vs Kosta Tszyu. Thats all that was.

sometime in round 5 Froch realized he couldnt win a boxing match, and thus made it a foul plagued street fight.

 

Post it dumbass. I know you are probably referring to a clinch where Froch is holding Dirrel by one hand and hitting him in the back of the head iwth the other.

That is not turning your back on a fighter

 

Where have i said anything about Froch looking impressive? Froch was ****ing awful, hence why i felt Dirrell nicked it by a round or two. However, Dirrell also fought poorly and in most of the rounds there was nowhere near enough action to conclusively say that one fighter deserved the round over the other hence why it could have gone either way and was far from being a robbery. If judges were actually allowed to score even rounds more often i think Dirrell wins the fight, as he did take 3 or 4 rounds in the fight conclusively, whilst Froch managed maybe 2 rounds clearly. The rest of them very little happened and they could have been scored either way.

 

Home town decision?
Boxing News and The Ring Magazine both had Froch as a close winner. It was a close fight which could have gone either way, but it wasnt a robbery.

 

No, I'm not talking about that. It's where Dirrell goes in for the 10th clinch of the round, grabs Froch's left arm, and then turns his back on Froch. It's just after Dirrell turns to the ref to complain again.

Trouble is it's got English commentary, and they're praising Dirrell, his efforts and his speed. I don't think you'd be able to handle listening to that. It would shatter your biased beliefs that everyone in the arena was against Dirrell.

 

Pretty much how I see it.

 

He lost b/c he ran from him and held him so much. If he fought him more like he fought AA in the first 8 rounds, he would have beat him, most likely.

 

Post it just because I would like to hear English commentary and see how they scored/saw the fight.

 

As I thought, Froch is holding onto Dirrell while he pounds him in the back of the head. Thats why you wont post it.


In the 10th froch turns his back to Dirrell all the way, maybe Dirrell should have taken a page out of Froch's book and bashed him in the back of the head.

 

Froch didnt not win the fight vs Andre dirrel he was lucky to get the gift from the judges.
I cant wait until he gets a beat down by Andre Ward

 

It is when the only the clean shots that your opponent lands are rabbit punches.

 

Well no, it isn't. Especially if you're opponent is actually looking to fight. This isn't the amateurs.

 

why wont you answer my post dirrell **** sucker?

 

Shut the **** up! if the ref dont call it its not a problem. obviouslt the refs know about the fighters bad habits b4 the fight, the are briefed and watch tape, and are getting an ear full from the opposite camp! its not on purpose obviously by the eyes of the ref.