Was Dirrell faking it???

there is also no precedent for the ignorance and general inanity of your remarks on this topic. It's unprecedented. I therefore conclude you must be faking or at the very least pulling our collective leg.

Your arguments are truly Mayorgaic in their total disregard for logic, coherence, and sense. I stand in awe of their stupidity.

 

atsch

 

Wlad had a great trainer who placed emphasis on his attributes, his height and reach.

What exactly would a guy like Abraham who is shorter then most of the fighters in the tournament with a short reach do to change his game?

That shell and strength have gotten him this far, and it probably won suffer against fighters like Kessler and Froch because like Taylor they stand infront of their opponents, against Ward and Dirrell its gonna be found wanting.

But Abraham has bad footwork, no jab, and like his opponent to come to him. Him changing that style will probably see him losing much more. He's just not quick enough

 

when you cannot refute the argument attack the arguer......

 

You havent made any argument, you are just parroting what another poster says because of your bias.

I already shown how poor his argument was, all that was left was to show your bias.

 

Its pointless in debating with that *****...He never uses facts to base his arguement...He's kinda like Lance bitchass, Never listen to the whole story but always dismisses facts and replace it with his own opinion!:-(

Quite sad homie!:verysad

 

responses without substance don't constitute a successful refutation

bias is irrelevant to the point being made. you could be dirrells cousin i could be abraham's, it doesn't really matter, we could be two guys in a debating class each given a side to take, the name calling and character attacks display desperation. It doesn't matter that you are MichiganWarrior if you make a valid argument, although it may explain your desire to reach for emotionalism rather than logic.

 

How can refute your private fantasy?

Your delusions are irrefutable, that much I admit. It is one of the drawbacks of arguing with the deranged.

 

Rudyard the Gay talk Shepherd.

"come all yee esb boxing fans! my sheep! lets post homosexual imagery, describe these acts in detail and call each other homosexual names! Its so GAYngsta!"

 

well, ok, you are down to name calling.....the argument has been laid out and this is what you come back with.

You have made some seriously awful arguments that were blown to bits.

You actually reasoned that it couldn't be fake because the doctor's reacted to it as if it wasn't.

 

Am I suppose to be offended by that corny ass ****??? I see you still cant make logical sense with your post...Your post are going everywhere in this thread...Better your arguement hoe.

Lame ass dude!:rofl

 

Most brawlers give away the first few rounds, Margarito used to give away the first few rounds all the time.

Its not because he's lazy its because the other guys not tired and is not gonna get caught by wide looping punches so early in the fight.

They have to break their opponents down. Against a slick boxer with world class speed, thats never going to work, and Abraham opening up earlier is just going to see him lose worse. He doesnt have the speed, footwork nor technique for that. And after 30 fights thats not gonna change.

Abrahams current style plays to his attributes. If he tried to become something else, he'd quickly be found wanting.

 

yeah you have really added a lot to this thread, great stuff. Find an appropriate forum for the topic you wish to discuss....and quit lying to yourself that it is boxing.

 

LMAO, I'm suppose to listen to you...A guy who basis his whole arguement on opinion and dismissing facts!...Gotcha hoe!:good

 

My arguments had plenty of substance, of course it matches up with who im talking to aswell. When your argument is so poor and based on fantasy and little actual evidence, its always going to be hard to get across to the other guy he's wrong. Its like arguing with someone who believes the Easter bunny is real. He's not real "Prove it".

My logic is in the 1 second that Dirrell was KO'd he couldnt formulate a plan the way he did and execute it as perfectly as he did. Your argument seems to be that he could infact formulate such a plan in such a brief period of time, and that it was all premeditated to steal the victory from Abraham.

To someone who thinks logically this is silly. To you its possible.

Now however we know what horse you were pulling for and why you believe Dirrell was faking. You said it yourself that if he wasnt hurt there shouldnt have been a DQ. Which even the most unbiased observer would note that even if he was faking, that a DQ was in order because of the fact that Abraham was fully aware Dirrell was on the ground and not caught up in the moment.