I think Carl Froch is pretty underrated on this forum.

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by horst, Mar 30, 2010.


  1. itrymariti

    itrymariti Cañas! Full Member

    13,728
    47
    Sep 6, 2008
    Jermain Taylor is/was not a boxer-puncher.
     
  2. itrymariti

    itrymariti Cañas! Full Member

    13,728
    47
    Sep 6, 2008
    :huh
     
  3. itrymariti

    itrymariti Cañas! Full Member

    13,728
    47
    Sep 6, 2008
    Coming out of three 50/50 fights 3-0-0 doesn't really need that much explanation. He got lucky. He's a decent fighter, but never elite.
     
  4. MichiganWarrior

    MichiganWarrior Still Slick! Still Black! Full Member

    26,793
    7
    Mar 20, 2010
    Good jab, good footwork, good speed, good power.

    Mikkel Kessler basically.
     
  5. 46and0

    46and0 It's irrefutable. Full Member

    7,011
    139
    Dec 6, 2008
    Froch is a tough, resilient fighter with good punching power and enormous self-belief. He lost to Dirrell though. It was a home-town decision.
     
  6. wow_junky

    wow_junky Retired Full Member

    1,317
    0
    Jun 21, 2008
    So Froch is a caveman with gloves yet he took AD to a SD win :lol: what does that say about Dirrell?
     
  7. lefthook31

    lefthook31 Obsessed with Boxing banned

    20,862
    138
    Jul 6, 2007
    Yes he is/was
     
  8. lefthook31

    lefthook31 Obsessed with Boxing banned

    20,862
    138
    Jul 6, 2007
    :lol:
     
  9. StreetsOfGold

    StreetsOfGold Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,252
    1
    Nov 9, 2008
    :deal

    You need to remember that froch forced dirrell to get his track shoes on, dirrell was forced to fight the way he did by froch's actions in the ring.
    I think the thing with froch is you hit him and he doesn't even flinch and just keeps coming with a high workrate, when dirrell realised this he knew he had to get his track shoes on then came on strong later on in the fight to try and seal the win which he should have got.

    I also think dirrells style and speed can make anyone look bad and I happen to think dirrell is the best fighter in the super six.
    I mean it's hard to catch a guy like that who is a very fast counter puncher that uses a lot of movement around the ring the entire fight a bit like mayweather.
     
  10. StreetsOfGold

    StreetsOfGold Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,252
    1
    Nov 9, 2008
    I think the top 5 so far is this, no idea about green because we haven't really seen him properly yet, who knows he may even beat ward.

    dirrell
    ward
    froch
    abraham
    kessler
     
  11. MichiganWarrior

    MichiganWarrior Still Slick! Still Black! Full Member

    26,793
    7
    Mar 20, 2010
    Thats the best description of Froch I have ever heard.

    Seriously Geico and boxing should put together a co-promotion, how a common bum can when a belt these days. "So easy, Carl Froch could do it"
     
  12. StreetsOfGold

    StreetsOfGold Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,252
    1
    Nov 9, 2008
    Join Date: Mar 2010:yep
     
  13. AGM

    AGM Member Full Member

    412
    0
    Apr 21, 2009
    Good honest fighter.
     
  14. itrymariti

    itrymariti Cañas! Full Member

    13,728
    47
    Sep 6, 2008
    "Boxer/puncher" is an over-used term in my estimation. If you're going to adopt such generous standards, then pretty much everybody is a "boxer/puncher": everybody punches their opponent; everybody gets knockouts from time to time. It's only those that incorporate heavy punching into their style effectively that are boxer/punchers: I'm thinking guys like Hearns who can lay you out with either hand or shut-you out behind the jab. Straight-up fighters who get the occasional KO don't count.

    Taylor is just an all-round boxer imo.
     
  15. itrymariti

    itrymariti Cañas! Full Member

    13,728
    47
    Sep 6, 2008
    Yeah.

    Well...

    :bart

    :shock:

    :?