Richardson Interview: "People would rather see Floyd Hit the Pads than fight"

I'm never going to agree with you. I have seen all floyd's fights and all of cotto's. I think Cotto has a better jab. In fact, I think Wlad does too.

 

Cottos jab is good because it helps him keep his opponents on the back foot which nullifys the power of any counter attempts.....

I think he lunges with it a bit too much somtimes, and will get dropped if somone can time a good counter while he is lunging..... I dont know if it was a jab or not, but one of the ways pac dropped him was when he was lunging foward if i remember correctly

 

Wlad has a better jab. Its powerful and he can control people with it. He has show the ability to win a fight with nothing but the jab alone. Cotto doesnt and hasnt however.

Sorry bro, Floyds jab is better, if you knew anything about boxing, you'd know that the way floyd uses the jab its more effective. :good


Oh and if you had seen all of Floyds fights you wouldnt have said Floyd never dropped anyone with a jab.

 

Your opinion on how much I know about boxing and how great floyd is are on the same level to me.

 

Pacquiao has a better jab then Cotto. Pacquiao was outjabbing him.

 

Pacquiao landed 3% of his jabs against Clottey.

 

floyd vs clottey wud of been a ****ing snooze fest

i don't think floyd would of taken it anyway, clottey too big for fraud.

 

I disagree, i think Pacs jab sucks

 

So now its changed to "recent fights"? What do you class as "recent fights", his last 2 fights? My statement wasnt about his "recent fights", it was about Floyds fights and you attacked it quickly to defend your boyfriend, only to find out you were wrong so now you are changing your statement. Idiot.

KO %. How about looking at the results of their last 20 or 30 fights? Pac has a lower KO% than he should have because early in his career he didnt get the KO's. 4 of his first 6 fights went the distance. Why? Because the guy had to put metal in his pockets just so he can make the minimum weight and he also lied about his age to make minimum age. This tells you that this was an underweight kid who was too young to be fighting, fighting grown men..still he won but obviously he wasnt gonna be stopping everyone.

Also his KO % is 74%, unless you expect him to KO his opponent on the fights he lost. :nut A guy with 20 wins, 20KO's but 20 losses wouldnt have 50% KO, course you can look at it like that but obviously the guy is better than 50% KO, his a KO artist winning all his fights by KO.

And who is hurt? I just dont speak rubbish. There's opinions and there are facts. Real men back up what they say, *****'s like you will claim something and be too scared to back it up. Obviously you said something, and are now too ***** to back it up, because if you could back it up, you would have no fear of leaving this board.

 

Pacquiao had a better percentage of jabs landed in 6 rounds. 4 for Cotto. And 2 even.

At round 4 when the fight turned for good Pacquiao landed 38% of his jabs.


Cotto has a worse jab then Pacquiao. Someone who just learned to throw a jab in the last 2 years. :rofl

 

So we dont count fights Pac lost? Why? He failed to knock his opponent out.

You dont get points for getting your ass kicked. :rofl

 

For the love of god.... please stop making me feel like i'm listening to a 9 year old.

 

Cotto got out jabbed by Pacquiao. Deal with it. Embarrassing.


Floyd has a better jab, he'd never let Pacquiao land 38% of his total punches on him, let alone his jab.

 

cmon, stop writing this stupid ****, your only making a fool of yourself

 

Getting outjabbed dosent mean 1 fighters jab is better than anothers.....

Pac's foot work nullified cottos better jab

Cottos bad defense allowed pac to land his shitty jab

For somone who is supposed to know alot about boxing, you sure like to miss out on the details of fights