Prime vs. Prime Camacho vs. Whitaker

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Slicknick56, Apr 2, 2010.


  1. Slicknick56

    Slicknick56 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,520
    6
    Dec 2, 2005
  2. PopeJackson

    PopeJackson Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,615
    3
    Dec 8, 2007
    Whitaker would win pretty handily i think. Camacho does nothing better than him, including inside fighting.
     
  3. Xplosive

    Xplosive Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,306
    9,900
    Jun 23, 2008
    Whitaker by wide UD. Camacho had all the speed and talent in the world, but the skill and intelligence differance would be the story of the fight. Pea would keep that brilliant southpaw jab in Camacho's face all night, and outbox him every round.
     
  4. Xplosive

    Xplosive Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,306
    9,900
    Jun 23, 2008
    Well Camacho certainly had faster hands, but it wouldnt matter.
     
  5. Slicknick56

    Slicknick56 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,520
    6
    Dec 2, 2005
    you really dont think camachos faster hands, consistant jab and lighting combinations would have affected Whitaker?
     
  6. Xplosive

    Xplosive Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,306
    9,900
    Jun 23, 2008
    No. Because Pea was hardly slow himself, and his jab would throw off Hector very early and make it difficult for Camacho to get off. I can see Camacho being competitive for the first 3-4 rounds, but by the mid rounds Pea would have him completely figured out and wouldnt look back.

    BTW - I remember hearing that Pea used to kick Camacho's ass in sparring.
     
  7. Xplosive

    Xplosive Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,306
    9,900
    Jun 23, 2008
    I could see a prime Camacho giving FLOYD a tough fight, but I really cant see him doing much w/Sweet Pea.
     
  8. laxpdx

    laxpdx Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,921
    77
    Oct 1, 2006
    Another tossup in the truest sense of the word. Somebody else said it best- this would be like watching two eels fight.

    I can't decide. Too tough to call. I'll just say this one ends in a draw.
     
  9. bodhi

    bodhi Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,229
    257
    Oct 22, 2009
    A good jab and timing beats speed. Whitaker had one of the best jabs ever and great timing. His jab would throw Camacho off-balance and out of his rythm and set up Pea´s own combinations. Very clear UD for Whitaker. Something like 9-3.
     
  10. bodhi

    bodhi Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,229
    257
    Oct 22, 2009
    I heard Pea did so when he was still an amateur. Never saw prove for this though.
     
  11. laxpdx

    laxpdx Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,921
    77
    Oct 1, 2006
    I've heard that too. I've also heard it was the other way around.
     
  12. MAG1965

    MAG1965 Loyal Member banned

    34,796
    65
    Dec 1, 2008
    Whitaker was greater. He could get to a higher level and had the skills to win fights any way he wanted. Camacho had great speed and looked dazzling, but he did not have the defensive skills of a Whitaker. Whitaker is ATG and Camacho is not.
     
  13. PhillyPhan69

    PhillyPhan69 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,094
    15,561
    Dec 20, 2006
    I am not surprised by the overwhelming result so far in Whitaker's favor, but have a hard time figuring out why Camacho is made to be light years away from Whitaker's level.

    I would lean towards Whitaker in a very close decision, but don't see the blowout many would indicate
     
  14. Bummy Davis

    Bummy Davis Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,666
    2,148
    Aug 26, 2004
    I think Sweet Pea would have took it but an in shape Camacho was a excellent fighter when in shape
     
  15. Clinton

    Clinton Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,234
    6,490
    Jan 22, 2009
    I agree with this 100%.