Does Pac look/sound guilty of using PEDs during interviews?

Just go by what you feel, which is all that everybody has on this issue anyway. No concrete evidence, hard proofs, etc.

Pac categorically denied using PEDs. Considering his boxing legacy on the line, his name, his greatness, and his political ambition, if he is lying, then everything crumbles. You could say that at this point of his life, all the things he has built himself on can easily go down the drain if he is later on proven to be lying.

And if he is indeed using PEDs, it will be just a matter of time before somebody from his camp rats on him, when things go sour.

So based on how he appears in interviews and the many times he has denied using PEDs, and also considering how religious he is, does anyone here really think he is using PEDs?

Vote.

 

His religion didn't stop him cheating on his wife so why would it stop him taking PED's?

 

he is, under this "guilty unless proven innocent" set up.

 

Nice vote options too btw.atsch

 

He did not repeatedly deny that one though, that is the difference.

 

Do you really feel Pac is guilty of using PEDs?
Yes, he appears so (I am from moron mountain by the way)

No he is not.

Hell the **** yeah X

 

So his religion lets him shag about behind his wife's back, just not lie about it.

 

It's safe to assume that if Pacquiao didn't come off as looking guilty or at least looking like a liar, one of worshippers would never even feel the need to make this thread. They definately wouldn't feel the need to rig the poll questions in order to discourage people from answering yes.

 

No, his religion does not tolerate that.

Everybody makes a mistake. What has been done in the past can not be undone.

So if Pac denied having an affair ala Bill Clinton on Levinski's blo job, it would have been a comparable situation.

 

He is not using PEDs. He has other reasons for ducking Mayweather.

 

I feel so. For two reasons
1.Who in their right mind would turn down a 40 million dollar payday because of blood testing?
2.Who in their right mind if they knew they had nothing to hide wouldn't take a drug test to ensure a clean mega fight and prove what they've been doing is legit?

 

Oh for ****'s sake....

 

:deal

 

I will answer your questions.

1. Pac would

2. Pac would.

You see, Pac and you do not have the same mindset at this point. I bet you would let a random guy **** you in the ass for $1 million dollars. If you don't, some smartass desperate street *** punk would say who in his right mind would turn down $1 million if he is not insecure of his sexual orientation.

If it was Pac 15 years ago, I think he would have donated half of his blood just to get a chance to fight for 1 million pesos. But that was then. He has come a long way and there is no imminent need for more money. Why let Floyd take an advantage going into this fight, knowing how big this fight can mean to his legacy?

Now I will ask the same questions to you:

1.Who in their right mind would turn down a 40 million dollar payday because of 10 days difference in blood testing, despite the opponent agreeing to a blood testing the day after?

2. Do you realise how many fighters are there how would get a chance to fight Pac even without any kind of testing?

 

please!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

pac is the champion and floyd is the challenger.

pac is number one pound per pound and floyd is distant second.

Pac has 20 plus cars and floyd car got repo'd.

1 $ equals 50 pesos.

pac got nike endorsement and floyd got reebok freebie rejects


you are not smart my friend. pac can slap floyd's face anytime he wants in a negotiation :rofl:rofl:good