nah mate he lost to froch and imo he lost to froch ,dirrell coul be one day but imo he lacks serious heart and a fighters mentality to stay at the top,just my opinion i hoep he does well
NO YOU EURO DUMMY! he shut froch the hell out.... 9-3 ish froch didn't land more punches he didn't control dirrel he didn't fight with better technique he didn't do anything better than dirrel in that fight besides throw dirrell on the floor a bunch of times.... I don't give a **** what you say... if you think froch won that fight you are a moron who deserves to have hot waxed poured in your eyes
LOL you ***git. he lost to froch period. not one boxing writer at ringside had him winning. he tried to steal the title by running, holding, falling down to the canvas, faking illegal shots etc. good win over AA but he might of gotten sparked in the last 2 rounds - good job he did that Hollywood job to get the DQ win.
not yet, on his way though...this super 6 is kinda limited, i still cant see how they'd do against elites from higher divisions or lower divisions...
Dirrell beat Froch fairly on my card. But still, the official decision was L for him. Top 20 p4p for me.
So, he lost a close fight (maybe you think he won - I think he won - but the actual cards say he lost, and it could have gone either way) against a guy who's not P4P top 10, and he won a fight over a guy who's not P4P top 10, and he's beaten nobody else who's better than a journeyman, and you think he deserves a top 10 spot? You're crazy. If you think Dirrell deserves a spot, then Sergio Martinez deserves a spot even more.