That's what Lampley said after he implied he got a gift decision. "arum just walked over to castillo's corner and promised him a rematch"
I know he promised him a rematch. However, you would only rig a fight because you want to ensure that your guy wins. So why would Arum rig the fight and then give Castillo another shot to beat Floyd? Did he pay off the judges in the second fight as well?
And you're not just a biased Floyd hater? I don't root for Mayweather (and I ****ing hate his new nickname), his first fight with Castillo was pretty close, but no robbery, Luke.
It was a clear robbery, if castillo won, no one would have said **** except "well floyd's shoulder was hurt" You ***s coddle his nuts over everything. I am not in the least bit surprised. Haven't been yet by a mayweather fan response.
So then you're saying Arum paid off the judges in the first fight in order to make sure that Floyd won, and then promised Castillo a rematch right afterwards and didn't pay off the judges the second time. Under this scenario, what would be the point of paying off the judges the first time?
If you want to call it a robbery, that's your opinion. However, it makes no sense to say that Arum paid off the judges given the circumstances.
Who cares? I'm not Sr. Floyd Sr., Uncle Roger, and Pacquiao all believe in fairy tales and silly superstitions.
He obviously schmoozed them or influenced them to make sure his future star mayweather got his next weight class title and stayed marketable. He's a scum bag, as evidence by the judges ridiculous scores. Not even 1 judge gave the fight to castillo?? Not 1??? Not even a draw on 1 score card? ****ing robbery.