Then why would he promise Castillo a rematch right after the fight and not pay off the judges the second time? Wouldn't this just nullify his original actions? Wouldn't Castillo have just as good of a chance of winning the second fight? If people think you got a gift and then you lose the immediate rematch, that's like suffering two losses. That's why what you're saying makes no sense.
Let me stress, this is LukeO, him and logic can't co-exist if it gets in the way of his hating of Mayweather.
The request for a further drug test is a proof. Otherwise, the big fight would have happened already last month. So, it works against him.
Because if he didn't people would have flipped out, and he probably felt that mayweather would do better in the next fight. It makes perfect sense. He knew what he had told the judges, how much it was going to be called a robbery, and how to squelch the storm. If it's over your head it's not my fault, i'm not your mom... go ask her to explain basic logic to you.
Who has beaten Mayweather that was on PEDs? According to Pac, needles lost him the figtht against Morales.
Yes. Not to a floyd nut hugger. I completely get it. Let's part ways with his dick in your mouth and my brain in tact.
Good one. Now sit puzzled in silence trying to figure out why arum would promise one of his fighters a rematch after stealing his title from him.
As soon as I can get my hands on some of that **** you're smoking, maybe I'll abandon all logic and see things your way.